Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Spartan26, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Portable Document Format. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Falcon8765 (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi Techatology! Thanks for the prompt review and feedback. Your comment on the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eileen McGann was, "add references in discography section." By that, do you mean simply citations to her website, where the albums/CDs are available for sale? I've referenced her website already in the "External Links" reference section. Should I add a specific link to her "Albums" page within her website, where the albums and CDs appear for sale? Some of her older albums/CDs may be out of production by this time. Also, some of her CDs are (were?) available on Amazon.com and CDUniverse.com. Should I include those links as well? Or, were you looking for an advanced, tabular layout for the discography, with full linkages, á la Loreena McKennitt#Discography? If so, frankly I was hoping that I (or some other fan) could do that after the initial article had been posted...?
In short, I'm not sure what constitutes a valid, reliable reference for a discography? I've looked at Loreena McKennitt#Discography and Kris Kristofferson discography. I don't see (or didn't notice) any references on them, other than wikilinks to Wikipedia articles on each individual album--which I intend to produce in the fullness of time. I've also searched within "Help" and not found any specific style guides for discographies within artist articles. I did find two references within WikiProject--one is dormant--and both refer to, I believe, discographies as explicit Wikipedia articles, not discography sections within artist articles. In any event, I note the following [from Wikipedia:WikiProject Discographies/style#Citations and references sub-section 2.1 "General references"], "For the establishment of the general releases in a discography – that a certain release exists, was released in the first place, and is a part of the artist's body of work – general sources, as opposed to in-line citations, are sufficient. For additional non-contentious facts such as release date, record label, and catalog number, general sources are also acceptable."
Would you mind clarifying for me what sort of references you are looking for? (And where you would expect to see/ find them within the article?
Thanks -Spartan26 (talk) 08:14, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I would just like to see the reference on where did you get all the list of songs that you put in the discography section. (chat) techatology 23:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Hi Techatology, I've included a direct link to Eileen McGann's website page that contains all of her recordings. I've also included her pages on AllMusic.com and Discogs.com, but noting that those entries are incomplete and with some errors. I would also have you note that Eileen McGann is the sole proprieter of her own label, Dragonwing Music, which has very limited distribution at the moment. Nevertheless, her albums are available directly through her website. I point this out in hopes of obviating any suggestions that her article is "advertising" by others (and, thus, being flagged for deletion by them), because I included the very reference which you asked for. I appreciate your thoroughness and advice in making the article better. Thanks. -Spartan26 (talk) 05:29, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Spartan26, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi Arctic Kangaroo,
Your comment on my Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eileen McGann is that I "have not addressed the previous comment." Please review my talk with Techatology, above. I believe that I have addressed his comments, as you might have seen if you had compared the history of the article from when he made his comment to the 'current' edition. I will ask you the same question that I asked him: What sort of references are you looking for and where would you propose that I put them? (Given that, as far as I can tell, no other artist has significant references for their albums within their discography section. Furthermore, I reiterate the only policy/ style guidelines that I have been able to find, which indicate that, to paraphrase, "General references are sufficient for a discography.") Thanks for your help. -Spartan26 (talk) 08:32, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 
Eileen McGann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sionk (talk) 12:36, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eileen McGann, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BA and MA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada edit

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Cdn Frces Admiral Shoulder Board.gif edit

 

The file File:Cdn Frces Admiral Shoulder Board.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canadian female folk songwriters edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian female folk songwriters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canadian folk songwriters edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian folk songwriters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:41, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply