This editor left Wikipedia in December 2007 and will not be returning. Please do not post anything on the talk page. Thanks ~ Troy Bannister a.k.a. Soxrock

File:LA 11333.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LA 11333.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Josh Vitters for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Vitters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Vitters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NBASeasonTOC edit

 Template:NBASeasonTOC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nick Schmidt for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Schmidt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Schmidt (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

"AFL on BSPN" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect AFL on BSPN and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 30#AFL on BSPN until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix (talk) 03:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of B. J. Averell edit

 

The article B. J. Averell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable reality television contestant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgsu98 (talk) 22:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of B. J. Averell for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B. J. Averell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B. J. Averell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bgsu98 (talk) 21:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of ESPN College Football Friday Primetime edit

 

The article ESPN College Football Friday Primetime has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since June

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply