License tagging for Image:5505103 2 300.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:5505103 2 300.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:044006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

SquiZZ page

edit

Please do not censor the word "Fuckin" on the SquiZZ page. The name of the show was "The Fuckin' Metal Show". It was titled on SquiZZ "The Fuckin' Metal Show". Wikipedia is an Internet encyclopedia, and if something contains the word "Fuck" in it, just let it go.--XMBRIAN 00:15, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Recreation

edit

You have recently re-created the article Timmy the Barbarian/No Substitute for Crazy!, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. - Lucky 6.9 01:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:Lakewa1.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Lakewa1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thank you for uploading Image:Forest fellsmere.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Donald Albury 23:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for Image:Blue cypress lg osprey2.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Blue cypress lg osprey2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:SR19.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:45, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Upstream Downstream

edit

Thanks for all the work on articles about the St. Johns River and lakes in the area. I wanted to point out, however, that you've got your upstream/upriver and downstream/downriver backwards. Upstream is towards the source of the river. So, for example, Lake Washington is upstream of Lake Winder because it is closer to the headwaters. Lake Poinsett is downstream of Lake Winder because it is farther away from the headwaters. Keep up the great work! Fl295 18:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Volusia County Road 4164

edit

An editor has nominated Volusia County Road 4164, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volusia County Road 4164 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 16:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Florida State Road 5023

edit

I have a quick question for you in regards to this article that you created. According to the title it is a state road, but in the article it says county road. Which is it? Also, I could not find it on a map, I found a Michigan Blvd in Cocoa with no number designation, is that the road in question? Any help in this matter is greatly appreciated. --Holderca1 16:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


A tag has been placed on Florida State Road 5023, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Holderca1 14:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Eco_econ_wetland.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Iamunknown 17:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Econ_map.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Iamunknown 17:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Econ_river4_s.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Iamunknown 17:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Reflctn.jpg, by Iamunknown (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Reflctn.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Reflctn.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Reflctn.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Deer Run, Brevard County

edit

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Deer Run, Brevard County, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Donald Albury 13:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Boca_west_300.jpg

edit

  Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Boca west 300.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:http://www.bocabeaches.com/boca_west.asp in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article [[Talk:Image:Boca west 300.jpg|Talk page]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Boca west 300.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article [[Talk:Image:Boca west 300.jpg|Talk page]]. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Boca west 300.jpg]] with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Boca west 300.jpg]] saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you want to edit constructively, take a look at the welcome page. Thank you. Iamunknown 18:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Volusia County Raod 4164

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Volusia County Raod 4164, by Pilotboi (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Volusia County Raod 4164 fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

This article is a duplicate of the article titled County Road 4164 (Volusia County, Florida). It simply has a typo in the name (Raod instead of Road). My guess is the author made the typo when creating it, made another one, and then did not care to delete the typoed article.


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Volusia County Raod 4164, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:FLMap-doton-Flagler-Estates.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell babelfish 02:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

The article County Road 2002 (Volusia County, Florida) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Fredddie 04:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of County Road 419 (Osceola County, Florida)

edit
 

The article County Road 419 (Osceola County, Florida) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Fredddie 04:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of County Road 503 (Brevard County, Florida) for deletion

edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article County Road 503 (Brevard County, Florida), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Road 503 (Brevard County, Florida) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979  04:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of County Road 507 (Brevard County, Florida) for deletion

edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article County Road 507 (Brevard County, Florida), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Road 507 (Brevard County, Florida) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979  04:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of County Road 419 (Osceola County, Florida)

edit
 

The article County Road 419 (Osceola County, Florida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable county route in Florida. Only possible link to notability is unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of County Road 2002 (Florida) for deletion

edit
 

The article County Road 2002 (Florida) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Road 2002 (Florida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979  04:57, 20 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article List of county roads in Miami-Dade County, Florida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is essentially a dab page, and there are 2 links on it. One to a non-existant page, and another to a bridge. No need for a list of 2 routes.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 02:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of WFHA-LP

edit
 

The article WFHA-LP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable low power radio station.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 02:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of County Road 516 (Brevard County, Florida)

edit
 

The article County Road 516 (Brevard County, Florida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable county road that does not meet the WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 02:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of County Road 516 (Brevard County, Florida) for deletion

edit
 

The article County Road 516 (Brevard County, Florida) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Road 516 (Brevard County, Florida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979  01:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Brevard County Roads

edit

 Template:Brevard County Roads has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Admrboltz (talk) 00:17, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of County Road 4011 (Volusia County, Florida) for deletion

edit
 

The article County Road 4011 (Volusia County, Florida) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Road 4011 (Volusia County, Florida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Admrboltz (talk) 19:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lake Washington (Melbourne)

edit
 

The article Lake Washington (Melbourne) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced. No reason given for why this is notable also.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 00:51, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway

edit

Category:Indian River Lagoon Scenic Highway, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 07:35, 23 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Windover Farms of Melbourne

edit
 

The article Windover Farms of Melbourne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability for places - WP:GEOLAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – The Grid (talk) 15:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of WFHA-LP for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WFHA-LP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WFHA-LP (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AusLondonder (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply