October 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you recently removed content from Juan Carlos Pinzón without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jp×g 07:24, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Information on that page is not verifiable. Skoobydoo95 (talk) 07:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Do share reliable sources or else the information will be removed again Skoobydoo95 (talk) 07:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The reliable sources were removed by yourself, Skoobydoo95. JPxG restored them.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Skoobydoo95, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Skoobydoo95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: Dada Shyam (October 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Amkgp were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~ Amkgp 💬 18:07, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


Disruption edit

You are inching close to a block, though I suspect you know this already, so I suggest you stop. Praxidicae (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:21, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dada Shyam edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dada Shyam, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply