Skiyomi

This place is so big. Where should I start contributing?

Welcome!

Hello, Skiyomi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Home Lander (talk) 18:52, 8 April 2018 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Are "orders" like this allowed here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:216.49.124.51

Seems rather demanding to me.

Also, am I asking this in the right place?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Skiyomi (talk • contribs)

No it's not allowed, and I've reverted it. If you have further questions, the WP:TEAHOUSE is the way to go. Home Lander (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Okay, thank you.

Is my account too "old" to use the Teahouse?

I have a couple of questions about editing, and awhile back someone pointed me towards the Teahouse. However, it says the Teahouse is meant for new users. Since my account is now a few weeks old, does that mean it's too old to ask questions in the Teahouse? Thank you. Skiyomi (talk) 02:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

You can still use Teahouse or try WP:HELPDESK as well. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 02:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Star Wars: The Last Jedi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Star Wars: The Last Jedi was changed by Skiyomi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947378 on 2018-04-17T10:26:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stage name. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stage name was changed by Skiyomi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951054 on 2018-04-17T10:36:52+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brad Knowles (rugby league). 331dot (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

UTRS and SPI

• Please see https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/31527
• Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Skiyomi/Archive --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

this review is now closed.

Unfortunately, there has been another development. 2020-05-04T22:08:51 Jpgordon block settings for Elianna Sei with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) ({{CheckUser block}}: Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia). As this is a checkuser block, and as the most recent edits with this account occurred in May, the earliest would be November, 2020. Even then, we would need a check user approval first.

User confirmed Elianna Sei is theirs in this UTRS ticket. I'm supposing we'd need a check user consult on any further requests. User is WP:CBANned due extensive socking under WP:3X. User remains globally blocked at this writing. There are further considerations discussed in the UTRS ticket. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC) User page has checkuser tag. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:17, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

User has been engaging in ban evasion as 216.49.96.0/19 to continue their racist attacks, in July 2020. --Yamla (talk) 20:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Your email

You will not be allowed access to UTRS to appeal until you have fulfilled the standard offer. The fact that you continue to create accounts despite being globally locked demonstrates you are not able to follow the simplest of requirements for an unblock to be considered.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:34, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Skiyomi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I realize that I have broken several rules here on Wikipedia and posted some offensive content on some occasions. And I sincerely apologize for that. I promise that from this point forward, it will not happen any more. I'll focus instead on adding updated information to video game and amusement park articles, as well as correcting typos in various articles. Is it possible for me to be unblocked (or at least have a review on the admin noticeboard)? I want my account to be globally unlocked, but the stewards (Alfred Newman) have told me that I must first get my Wikipedia block lifted before my account will be unlocked. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Our usual standard offer is 6+ months without any form of socking or block evasion. You haven't even made it a month. If you want to be considered for an unblocking, you'll need to stay away for awhile longer. only (talk) 22:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Attempted ban evasion over at User talk:96.31.195.85, reseting the standard-offer timer. --Yamla (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Unblock request

Per consensus at WP:AI, this account will not be unblocked. Since it is globally locked as vandalism-only account, further unblock requests here are pointless. If they continue, I would recommend protecting the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

No

I will not reinstate your talk page access.  Confirmed sockpuppetry means you are not eligible for unban consideration at this time. Frankly, you will never be unbanned on Wikipedia given your long-term horrific behaviour. Go troll someplace else. --Yamla (talk) 13:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)