June 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Uremia may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Uremia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Uremia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Immunity, Fatigue, Sterility and Anorexia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tubulopathy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon's syndrome. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vasculitis

edit

I'm not sure if the table you added is based on the source or whether you have completely copied it. Consider copyright.

At any rate, have a look at what I've done with the citation. Books should ideally be referenced with a citation template. JFW | T@lk 20:44, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Also, make sure the use of capitals is in line with MOS:CAPS! JFW | T@lk 20:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

HiJfd, I've just been copying tables out of a book. As far as I know, there is no way to paraphrase a table. Thanks for the citation info.Sion55 (talk) 21:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hmm, there is a chance that you might run foul of copyright. By "paraphrasing" I mean changing the terminology, layout etc. JFW | T@lk 20:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I believe as long as you reproduce the results and don't actually photocopy them, your in the clear. All you need to do is reference them. Since its not possible to photocopy in wiki unless your posting a picture, your in the clear.Sion55 (talk) 19:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: RBC Morphology (April 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bradv 00:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Sion55, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bradv 00:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: RBC Morphology (April 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ringbang (talk) 01:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:RBC Morphology

edit
 

Hello, Sion55. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "RBC Morphology".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 09:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply