Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabah Integrity Alliance Association (July 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Sinarsabah, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sabah integrity alliance association, from its old location at User:Sinarsabah/Sabah integrity alliance association. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Daniel kenneth (talk) 11:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabah integrity alliance association (July 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Writer 2.0 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Writer 2.0 Talk 13:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabah integrity alliance association (July 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 29 July

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabah Integrity Alliance Association (July 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Daniel kenneth was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Daniel kenneth (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sabah Integrity Alliance Association has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sabah Integrity Alliance Association. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:34, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Sabah integrity alliance association has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sabah integrity alliance association. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)Reply