May 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Joshua Jonathan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of the Ten Kings have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 05:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

don't put your heascanon in wikipedia, the specific ethnic or cultural backgrounds of these kings(10 kings) are not explicitly stated in the Rigveda. warning Simmorta (talk) 06:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Ten Kings. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battle of the Ten Kings was changed by Simmorta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895298 on 2024-05-09T06:48:40+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Ten Kings. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

you should refrain from using fictional or assumptions story in wikipedia
present thing as they're, no heascanon Simmorta (talk) 08:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.