ShartingSophia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimithen John Johnathen Johnson Jamaica Nickithen Auto Vibrato Avoconodosin (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jimithen John Johnathen Johnson Jamaica Nickithen Auto Vibrato Avoconodosin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, ShartingSophia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jimithen John Johnathen Johnson Jamaica Nickithen Auto Vibrato Avoconodosin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jimithen John Johnathen Johnson Jamaica Nickithen Auto Vibrato Avoconodosin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 05:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jimithen John Johnathen Johnson Jamaica Nickithen Auto Vibrato Avoconodosin (March 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:44, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

LOOKIE HERE BUD. You stated in your decline to my request for publishing that

my article was an "attempt at humor" but i'11 have vou know it was

' 'MUCH'' more than an attempt. In fact, it was the funniest

piece of literature that has ever graced gods green earth. It is okay to decline and ridicule my witting for being not serious and according to you "unsalvageably incoherent" but to insult my incredible work for its humourus content is insanity. What qualifications do you think * 'YOU' have to be judging my imaculate composition.

In conclusion,

This page should not be speedily deleted because I myself am a great fan of Jimithen John Johnathan Johnson Jamaica Nickithen auto vibrato Avoconadoson  and I believe others would enjoy learning about his story, how he came to be and his legacy that he lives on with currently. There’s multiple sources stating that this article is in fact Not bogus and I would like you to have some faith in your heart for that as well. His story is one that will be passed down for generations and generations to come but not enough people can know about his legacy if his story isn’t shared with the other wonderful people of the world

Thank you so much for

the fast response and I look foreard to (hopefully) another fast response to my comment ShartingSophia (talk) 06:34, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Just to clarify what exatly was confusing/incoherent because I assumed you would understand unless you were estupido. ShartingSophia (talk) 06:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

@Dan arndt ShartingSophia (talk) 06:41, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

I think that should read what is considered an encyclopaedic article - Wikipedia is not a fanpage for promoting your favourite artist/individual - it also needs to be factually based and referenced with reliable secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 06:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

I think that I have provided an incredible ammount of factually based information in which I am the source. You are currently using big words such as "encyclopaedic" that I had to google to understand. I am just a youngin to up to some bafoonery so please un ban me. ShartingSophia (talk) 07:29, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:55, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShartingSophia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason here ShartingSophia (talk) 07:16, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Duplicate, blank request. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I DID NOTHING WRONG

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ShartingSophia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

(redacted)

Decline reason:

I'm not sure what this is, but it isn't an unblock request. The reason for the block would seem to be correct. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.