Scrambled eggs1976

Du miststuck, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Du miststuck! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Scrambled eggs1976 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

scrambled_eggs1976 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I did not know du_miststuck was a bad word I just saw it in a sticker on my coworkers desk when I was thinking of usernames. Can my points and edits be transferred to scrambled_eggs1976 instead? Du miststuck (talk) 07:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from Wikipedia:Changing username and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello Scrambled eggs1976. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Scrambled eggs1976. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Scrambled eggs1976|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 21:39, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Reply:

Hi Praxidicae,

I am not being paid to remove these flags and I do not work for this company. I am the one who put the flags in the first place. After reading a bit more about the company I realized that they are noteworthy in Malaysia. I am removing some ambiguous bits to meet Wiki standards. Since I have answered this message, as per your instructions, I will proceed to remove tags and fix the parts that seem overtly promotional or non-encyclopaedic.