SchmiAlf

Welcome

Hello, SchmiAlf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Lklundin (talk) 18:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello SchmiAlf! Your additions to German influence on the Soviet space program have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for this extended explanation. In my last edit, I was following the general approach already used in German influence on the Soviet space program which does not use quotation marks in most cases although original language (e.g., from Siddiqi) is used or sometimes, when paraphrased, modified from the original meaning. I could have easily added quotation marks for some direct quotes from Anatoly Zak's Russian Space Web (https://www.russianspaceweb.com/gorodomlya.html#end) and Dmitry Ustinow's document of 1951 (https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/memorandum-d-f-ustinov-l-p-beria-use-german-specialists).

In my opinion the complete deletion of my edit severely interferes the dispute of the article's content which I have escalated via Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#German influence on the Soviet space program. Therefore it would be very helpful if you make my last edit available for me by copying it into a subpage of my user page (or any other acceptable way). Otherwise the dispute (or review of third opinion) has lost its basis and I have to redo part of my investigations and proper structuring of my arguments. SchmiAlf (talk) 07:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

SchmiAlf can you please confirm you do not have a conflict of interest, as per WP:COI, particularly with your edits of Helmut Gröttrup and all other articles that you have been editing that include Helmut Gröttrup, for example, German influence on the Soviet space program, Space Race, etc. Ilenart626 (talk) 12:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

I confirm that I do not have a conflict of interest about myself, family, friends, clients, employers, or financial and other relationships. My honest interest is contributing to Wikipedia and improving it based on sources and insight available to me. For Helmut Gröttrup and Soviet rocketry I have digged into many German sources and other sources (such as CIA interrogations, released in 2010) which are not yet adequately considered in the English Wikipedia. SchmiAlf (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

SchmiAlf I note on your German User page you state:

• ”Herausgeber der Dokumentation "Helmut Gröttrup – Raketen, Banknoten, Chipkarten" zur Feier seines 100sten Geburtstags im Februar 2017 mit einer Leseprobe.[19]” (English - Editor of the documentary “Helmut Gröttrup – Rockets, Banknotes, Chip Cards” to celebrate his 100th birthday in February 2017 with a reading sample.[19]).
• ”u.a. mit einem Beitrag zur Festschrift anlässlich seines 100. Geburtstags[17] und einem Roman Gröttrup und das Universum der erfinderischen Zwerge[18]” (English - among other things with a contribution to the commemorative publication on the occasion of his 100th Birthday[17] and a novel Gröttrup and the universe of the inventive dwarfs[18]).

Given the above, can you please explain how this is not a breach of WP:COI of the articles you have been editing, particularly Helmut Gröttrup and the other articles I mentioned above? Ilenart626 (talk) 23:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

There is no breach of WP:COI. Helmut Gröttrup's fate inspired me to have a more detailed look into his history and I grabbed through the bulk of available literature, including his personal letters (via his daughter Ursula Gröttrup) and his inheritance handed over to the Deutsches Museum. With this profound understanding of what had happened on Gorodomlya Island, I noticed that the English Wikipedia has taken a strange turn since the mid of 2022 for the description of the years 1948/1949 which more and more deviated from what I have read. Therefore I engaged as Wikipedia author to correct this (eventually confirmed by @Neopeius). SchmiAlf (talk) 09:26, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

SchmiAlf, your German website highlights that you are the editor of “Helmut Gröttrup – Raketen, Banknoten, Chipkarten” and your novel “Gröttrup und das Universum der erfinderischen Zwerge” are both for sale on the Internet. This appears to me to be a fairly clear breach of WP:COI as it would be in your commercial interest to promote Helmut Gröttrup and sell more of your books. By your above statement, plus comments you have made on various talk pages, it is also obvious that you know his daughter Ursula Gröttrup, which means your edits of Helmut Gröttrup articles and all other articles that include Helmut Gröttrup would be a breach of WP:COISELF. Therefore I cannot understand how you can say that you are complying with WP:COI? I request that you explain how you are not in breach of WP:COI, given the above. Ilenart626 (talk) 11:27, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

There is no German website, it is just my user page and out of discussion here. For avoiding a conflict in the English Wikipedia I deleted the reference to “Helmut Gröttrup – Raketen, Banknoten, Chipkarten” from Helmut Gröttrup's further readings. However, WP:COI states "using material you have written or published is allowed within reason, but only if it is relevant, conforms to the content policies, including WP:SELFPUB, and is not excessive. I think there is enough reason that it is relevant and it is not excessive. But this mentioning is not worth further discussion. Just preventative: Nadine Schmidt is not related to me and I don't know her.

WP:COISELF does not apply here (i) because the article about Helmut Gröttrup has been created long before I made my first Wikipedia contribution (for sure he is a relevant person!), (ii) it is not an article about myself and (iii) it is not about Ursula Gröttrup. So what?

None of my publications has any meaning for the talk in Space race with a new statement which clearly no longer supports Option C. SchmiAlf (talk) 17:43, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

SchmiAlf, unfortunately I will have to disagree with your interpretation of the requirements of WP:COI. Their is a clear process to follow, therefore I will be raising this issue at the conflict of interest noticeboard, and we can let other editors decide. Ilenart626 (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	You've done an excellent job of keeping your cool and presenting your arguments cogently. Keep it up! Neopeius (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

(I would have waited to change the language on the page, though—you're going to get reverted. --Neopeius (talk) 15:13, 5 December 2023 (UTC))

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Ilenart626 (talk) 14:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC)