Price Tag edit

I want to welcome you to edit the article in my userspace, as you did a nice job on the one that you made. However, do not add of the critical reception that was in yours as that was all from forums. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 16:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jessie J edit

 Template:Jessie J has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Yves (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Opinion on this edit

Go here to leave your opinion on this matter. --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 00:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Citations edit

When you cite stuff, please use the citation templates to cite your sources. When you use nothing but links, they are subject to link rot. I Help, When I Can. [12] 01:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hey. Sure, i'll start and do it. Thanks for making me aware of it :). --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Here, this is the link I meant to give you. → WP:CT. I Help, When I Can. [12] 20:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

May 2011 edit

Please refrain from adding unsourced material to The X Factor (U.S. season 1) article unless you can provide reliable sources, thank you (talk) 18:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Paula has been confirmed as a judge. If you look at the main page, you will see. --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 18:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

X Factor edits edit

Hi there SaturdayMight, hope you are well. Yes Fatty2k10 was acting in an agressive manner and removing sourced content without a real basis and not assuming good faith. He has been banned for a period of 24 hours, perhaps indefinately dependant on whether he makes a good case for his actions and reverting of sourced content. I will keep you informed, and thanks for bringing it to my attention. Take care Yids2010 (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your feedback, he has now been blocked so all is good. Thank-you for getting back to me anyway. --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 12:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Frankie Sandford edit

Hi, thanks for some great work on this article. However, I noticed you added a fair use image to the article. It is generally against Wikipedia's BLP policy to add fair use images to articles to begin with, and in addition a rationale should be provided on the image page for ever single article the image is used in. I encourage you to take a look at WP:FU for further information on this topic.

Thanks, and keep up the great work. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I will take a look. :) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notorious edit

Just wanted to say you've done a good job with the article. Personally I don't really like the song but you've followed a format for the article similar to the standards in Missing You (The Saturdays song) and Higher (The Saturdays song). Considering that The Sats. are the biggest active girl group at the moment ... they need some good articles (y)? — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 02:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Aw thanks! I'm trying to sort out all of their related pages. I've just finished doing Frankie's and Mollie's so i'll be working on Una's, Rochelle's and Vanessa's when I get round to it. But thanks :). I'm not to keen on the song myself, but it seem's to be doing well on iTunes. :) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 19:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

User edit

Hi there mate, just to give you the heads up that Fatty2k10 is actively editing the Gary Barlow article adversely once again along with others under the alias of the IP 2.124.196.36. Just thought i'd let you know so you are aware. Hope you are well Yids2010 (talk) 21:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for letting me know. He is constantly making mayhem and he has been blocked a number of times; probably a permanent block took against him if he continues. --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 23:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Saturdays Third Album edit

I've moved the album page you've created to User talk:SaturdayMight1000/The Saturdays' third album. Per encyclopedic conditions and rules an untitled body of work cannot exist in the WP:Mainspace, hence its been moved to WP:Userspace. The article is now your sandbox which you can edit as you please. Upon having a firm release date and title it can be moved back into the main article user space. In the mean time please not that images cannot exist in the sandbox. I will take a look at the article once my exams are done but so far it seems like a good start so well done. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 23:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi thanks! I created it due to previously seeing Kelly Rowland's Here I Am not having a title or release date but having a artical and Coldplay has a page; Coldplay's fifth album thanks i'll get to work on it:) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Kelly's album was different as it was confirmed to be called Kelly Rowland but then that changed, and considering that there was so much information available there was nowhere to merge to. Coldplay's fifth album should not have its own page, I've addressed that issue. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 18:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oh right cool. Thanks for moving my page so i can continue editing. I hope you exams go well :) --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Notorious1.png listed for deletion edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Notorious1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 03:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sock puppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. –MuZemike 18:05, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

A sock puppet to what exactly? Because i really am confused! --SATURDAYmight. (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SaturdayMight1000 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been blocked for apparently "sock puppetting" yet I have no idea in this world where it has came from. I work hard on Wiki, I like to make good articals and researching for the articals. However, I don't know where all of this has came from.

Decline reason:

A checkuser confirmed that this is an alternate account of LadyLashes. You know very well what a sockpuppet is, you've been doing it for 2 years now. -- Atama 18:39, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well i would check again as I have not been sock puppeting!! Listen, I work hard on Wiki, I have no been sock puppeting i just want to continue working on wiki as i did.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Forever Is Over Video.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Forever Is Over Video.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I Help, When I Can.[12] 23:32, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Forever Is Over Video.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Forever Is Over Video.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Superbass single cover.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Superbass single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:X Factor Finalists 2010.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:X Factor Finalists 2010.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:20, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about The Saturdays' fourth album edit

Hello, SaturdayMight1000,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The Saturdays' fourth album should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Saturdays' fourth album .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 23:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Saturdays' fourth album edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Saturdays' fourth album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. –
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 00:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Superbass single cover.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Superbass single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (American TV series) edit

 Template:I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (American TV series) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 08:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply