Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi

Welcome

Hello, Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks so much and yes I am going to stay and learn many new things from encyclopedia With pleasure, Sarah xxxxxxxxx

Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello

I am new to Wikipedia Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 14:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Arabs are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 15:45, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks to you too 😊 Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 17:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Acroterion (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop

Hi, Sarah. Article talkpages are for discussing improvements to the related article. They're not forums for general discussion of the article's subject, and definitely not for expressing your own feelings about the article's subject. Please stop adding emotional posts and forum-type posts to talkpages. Here are some examples of such posts that you have added: [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Well, practically all of your posts are of this nature, and most of them have already been removed by other users. I notice that even though Largoplazo has explained to you above and you have responded, you have continued to make edits such as this. Please stop. And please don't this time give me a thumbs-up and carry on as before. I understand that you are new, but that type of editing doesn't help Wikipedia, it does the opposite. Perhaps you could instead aim for correcting errors, such as spelling errors, in articles while you're learning to contribute? Regards, Bishonen | tålk 21:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC).

Wrong category

I have reverted your addition of a category on the Talk:Animal page because a talk page does not belong in that category. The addition of that category appears to have been intended to advocate your point of view. As has been explained to you above, such advocacy is not appropriate in Wikipedia. Please refrain from adding inappropriate categories to talk pages. - Donald Albury 23:36, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

I just did a mistake Thanks for reminding me Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020: Stop editing right now, please

You seem to misconstrue what Wikipedia is about. Your most recent edits, to Talk:COVID-19 pandemic here and here simply add material which can already be found in the article, plus your personal advice. I had to revert both of them. What is your purpose at Wikipedia? If you think you were helping the world with this edit signing up for Wikipedia:WikiProject_COVID-19, you are mistaken. You've recently been warned about misusing talk pages. You seem to have a compulsion to type out edits at every opportunity, for reasons of your own, rather than to improve Wikipedia. You will find your account access for editing Wikipedia to be blocked shortly if you don't cease your disruptive editing.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. --Quisqualis (talk) 22:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

You need to read the Welcome message at the top of this page.

It says "Hello, Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi, and Welcome to Wikipedia!". The message contains links to articles which you have not read, but really, really need to read soonest. You keep stumbling around Wikipedia making typical beginner's mistakes, which wastes the time of other editors who must fix the problems you create and advise you. Worse still, you ignore the advice! Please read the articles at the links, all of them, so you may become a useful Wikipedia editor. At the moment, you seem not to realize that Wikipedia is not a forum, nor is it social media. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia project.--Quisqualis (talk) 23:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

• You have also been given very good advice at the Help Desk; please follow it.
• Another very important point is that you must on no account copypaste material from other internet pages into Wikipedia, as it violates their copyright. Your last three edits as of this moment are copyright violations. If you make another, I will block you from editing Wikipedia. Bishonen | tålk 23:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC).

Sorry for making distruptions Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 23:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Have you had a chance to read any of those articles in the Welcome message yet?--Quisqualis (talk) 01:14, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Yes now I understood Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 06:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Last warning

Sarah, I wrote to you on 13 December, as you can see above, that "Article talkpages are for discussing improvements to the related article. They're not forums for general discussion of the article's subject, and definitely not for expressing your own feelings about the article's subject. Please stop adding emotional posts and forum-type posts to talkpages." Several other people have told you the same thing, and have warned you that you may be blocked if you persist in making inappropriate posts to talkpages. Please answer two questions I'm going to ask you: what does this recent post of yours have to do with discussing improvements to the article Earthquake, and what on earth is this post doing on Talk:Algebra? Please don't say that you apologize, or that now you understand; it does not convince. If you don't stop making these irrelevant and unencyclopedic posts, I'm going to block you from editing. I understand that you mean well, but you're not improving the encyclopedia, and you're not taking on the advice you get. That wastes other people's time. Bishonen | tålk 15:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

And I know arabic very well so that is why I translated by myself what was said there in Algebra.

I did put emotional words in earthquake but I don’t see anything wrong in what I talked about in Algebra. Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Fine, I will stop it Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 12:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

I am sure you are about to say perhaps that I took all these words from a website but I didn’t this time, all of these are my own words. Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 12:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Talk pages are not social media

I notice that on 29 December, you approached another editor with the intention of telling them about your home city. Wikipedia is not based on what anybody knows, but on reliable sources. If that editor had asked for information on your home city, you would be welcome to provide reliable sources which provide that information. Instead, you went onto another user's Talk page, where someone had mentioned the city, and responded to that poster with an invitation to discuss your home city on your Talk page.

You don't seem to comprehend that Wikipedia is not for making friends and socialising. If normal editing of articles is not enough social stimulation for you, please find another venue, like Facebook. You will soon be blocked again if you do not stop your disruptive behavior.--Quisqualis (talk) 16:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

I wasn’t wanting to talk. I wanted to say that there are more Kurds than Turks That is all I what I wanted to say Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 10:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Surely you are aware that discussion of article facts is based on reliable published sources? You may be the world's greatest topic expert, but your own word is useless on Wikipedia unless cited in an independent, in-depth, reliable, published source. Anything else may be referred to as chitchat.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:42, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

On December 29, you attempted to socialize on Talk:Esenyurt

Your edits were reverted by Largoplazo with the explanation of "Doesn't belong here. WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK." Yet you still cannot grasp the concept that Wikipedia is not social media. If a person's own needs come before the good of Wikipedia, that disruptive person will have their account blocked. You are taking advantage of the fact that Wikipedia requires its users to be polite to disruptive editors. Soon, one editor will politely, but firmly, be forced to block you. If you believe the fact that several days went by before your comment was reverted means nobody really cares how you edit, you are greatly mistaken.--Quisqualis (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your edit on Talk:Algebra was inappropriate and reverted as such

Here you have offered, unsolicited and out of context, a translation from Arabic, of which, other editors did not see the significance, including me. Another editor, two hours later, reverted it with an edit summary of "huh?". For some reason, you apparently lack the capacity to work in tandem with other human beings. This is a serious liability. Please stop editing Wikipedia and save us the effort of having to permanently block you from editing.--Quisqualis (talk) 17:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

And yet you continue to socialise on Wikipedia...

Reaching out to socialise with a person flogging a new calligraphy venture? What are you thinking? Clearly, you are not here to make an encyclopedia.

"What it feels like to be in an earthquake"

You attempted to share your experiences of earthquakes on Talk:Earthquake. You lied to me when you said you'd read and understood the links to policies for Wikipedia editors. You ignore them at your own peril. This is a threat.--Quisqualis (talk) 17:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

You're invited! Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE - February 6th, 2021 -

February 6th, 11am-1pm E.S.T: Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE

Hello User:Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi! You are invited to join the Brooklyn based Sure We Can community for our 3rd NYC COVID-19 themed Wikipedia Edit-a-thon / translate-a-thon - ONLINE - Saturday, Feb 6th, 2021 11am - 1pm. The edit-a-thon is part of Sure We Can's work with NYC Health + Hospitals to stop the spread of Covid-19. We plan to continue to work on translating the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City article into the many languages spoken in New York City; as well as, work on other ideas about how information on wikipedia could slow the spread of Covid-19. We'd love to hear if you have any ideas. If you can not attend, please feel free to comment on my talk page, or here, or on the event page. Saturday February 6 Coronavirus in New York City: Translate-A-Thon - ONLINE (optional RSVP on-wiki). 11:00am - 1:00 pm E.S.T online via Zoom (optional breakout rooms available)

--Wil540 art (talk) 21:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for inviting me, but I didn’t visit wikipedia days ago so I missed it.

Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

I have ideas by translating from the languages I know 5 languages

Sarah Shaheenbaz Faizi (talk) 14:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)