June 2018 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yeh Un Dinon Ki Baat Hai has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yeh Un Dinon Ki Baat Hai. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Wikipedia has guidelines on how articles should be written. Please don't violate these guidelines. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Yeh Un Dinon Ki Baat Hai, you may be blocked from editing. Do not add overly long plot descriptions to this article Doing so goes against the Wikipedia Manual of Style. If you feel that this information absolutely has to be in the article, please open a discussion at Talk:Yeh Un Dinon Ki Baat Hai to justify this. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've opened a discussion at Talk:Yeh Un Dinon Ki Baat Hai regarding your addition of overly long plot descriptions. Please respond there. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of the story edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Timeline of the story requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PabloMartinez (talk) 18:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018 edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Yeh Un Dinon Ki Baat Hai, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:25, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Yeh Un Dinon Ki Baat Hai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 19:11, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I am Sorry for my mistake edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Santsaxena (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi Bbb23, I am really sorry about this. I will make sure that this will not happen again and I will make amends on this page. Please give me at least a chance to edit properly. I am really in love with this show and cannot see myself getting blocked. Please unblock me. I am really sorry for this and I assure you that this will not happen again. Please I am sorry, I will find a way to be in the laws of Wikipedia rules. Please, don't do like this to me, I am new to this and I will be in my limit. Please accept my apology and I promise that this will never ever happen again. Santsaxena (talk) 19:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have realized my mistake edit

Hi Bbb23, Zl Jony and Yamla, I have come to the realization that I have been making a big mistake by doing vandalism on the page. After I was blocked by you, I read the guidelines and understood each and every line of it. I know that I have been foolish all along and have been doing this mistake continuously, which I should not have done. I promise you that this time I will not do any such type of thing which will make you block me again. I will be at my limit and will work according to the guidelines and not violate it. Please accept my apology and I assure you that I will not repeat this mistake again.

Not able to see your message edit

Hi Bbb23, I am not able to see your message even though I have got a notification. Please forgive me for my mistake, and I promise you that I will not repeat vandalism again.