Welcome!

Hello, Russellweisfield, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rostz (talk) 14:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Thomas J. Watson. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rostz (talk) 14:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas J. Watson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Rostz (talk) 15:11, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Joe Cosley has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joe Cosley. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Cosley (October 31) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Russellweisfield, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Cosley has been accepted edit

 
Joe Cosley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:35, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Suggested improvements at Joe Cosley edit

Neat article, good work on fixing citations. Couple suggestions:

  • Could really use a photo of him; any US photo prior to 1923 is out of copyright and that you could just upload to Wikimedia Commons and use. If a photo you want to use is post-1923, under WP:Fair use you can upload one copyrighted photo, not to WC but to WP itself using the "upload file" button in your left margin. Let me know if you need help figuring out photo stuff.
  • The chronology is unclear, can you make it a little more specific when he became a ranger, when he was fired, when he escaped. Did all of this happen before or after he served in WWI? That's just a big inclarity in your article.

Fine work overall, just some touch-up would make it nice and strong. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ferede Aklum has been accepted edit

 
Ferede Aklum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 08:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)Reply