RosinDebow

Cheese

Right, I got confused with CTSWyneken (the article start with 'Welcome" and says I am ...). Anyhow, what I tried to say is that the article you found (copyrighted as you stated) is almost a straight translation of the French articles I found on the subject. In other words, I agree one should respect copyright information but from an initial external violation, it was hard to make something inventive (I may try to reshape but the basic facts will be close).

I liked the story about the colored ribbon and such (I did not know that ... while I know this region of France well). Also, I checked the origin of the name not from the article you pointed (which had it wrong) but from a search of the Avergnat language - that historical fact is interesting too (never realize this either ; most of the time, what is straight in your face is taken for granted).

I finally found your reply quite strong and not very encouraging to new contributing users.

Jlauret7 (talk) 23:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Reply posted to Jlauret's talk page. RosinDebow (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, RosinDebow, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am CTSWyneken. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Sign your posts on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~).
• Provide an Edit summary
• Take a look at Consensus of standards. It is always wise to read the talk page of an existing article before making major changes on it. Even then, I typically ask if anyone minds that I make a change. Very often they do! ;-)
• Create a User page

Again, welcome! And if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask. --CTSWyneken 23:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)^(talk)

Greetings

Thanks for contributing to the article I started about Ginger Smock. Nice to see someone else working on lesser-known musicians. :) Szarka 00:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Cycling!

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's cycling-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, you may be interested in the Cycling Portal. Also, if you intend to edit more cycling-related articles, have you considered joining WikiProject Cycling? It's a group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all cycling-related articles and we really would appreciate your input.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.  --Mk3severo 21:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

test

Wishful thinking

Hi, you deleted something I'd recently added to Dervla Murphy. I suppose it is wishful thinking, but surely there has to be some way to acknowledge the unusual personal choice she made, to bear what would have been called a bastard, in that time and place? This reflects on her, her strength of character and iconoclasm. If you know the writing about her better than I do, can you add a comment? ThanksBrainyBabe (talk) 02:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I've read a couple of her books but I'm not familiar with writings about her. I think that the article should only reflect what has already been written about her. I scanned the interviews under the external links, but did not find much connecting her being a single mother and the prevailing attitudes of the time, other than "She raised Rachel alone, a brave choice in 1960s Ireland" (Sunday Business Post) - why it was a brave choice is left unstated. RosinDebow (talk) 05:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I suspect there isn't much writing about her. I think the "brave choice" is clear in the context; thanks for finding it. How about modifying the existing sentence along these lines:

In 1968 she gave birth to her only child, fathered by Irish Times journalist Terence de Vere White, whom she never married. She raised her daughter Rachel alone, "a brave choice in 1960s Ireland" [ref], where the power of the Catholic Church was strong. Murphy spent the next five years working as a book reviewer before returning to travel writing.

What do you think? BrainyBabe (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Mentioning the influence of the church still seems like original research to me, even though it may be readily apparent to someone who knows anything about Ireland. However, if you look at this link referenced in the article [1] there is a nice quote from her about her position at the time (about the 9th paragraph down). RosinDebow (talk) 13:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hm. Ok. I want to give context to those readers who may not know. What about:

She raised her daughter Rachel alone, "a brave choice in 1960s Ireland" [ref], but felt herself in a secure position financially and professionally and thus safe from harassment. (She had written unpublishable novels earlier in her life, one of them, presciently, about a mother and her illegitimate child.) [ref]

And then, there is always the curious incident of the dog in the night time. Watson: but the dog didn't bark! Holmes: That is the curious incident. (I paraphrase, but the point is that what e.g. Murphy chose not to write can be more important than what was written. A philosophical point.) BrainyBabe (talk) 14:08, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Your revision sounds much better to me, though "harassment" is stronger than the word "criticism" in the source - I'll leave it up to you if you want to change that or not. Also, the second sentence probably doesn't need the parentheses. As for what she did not write - I agree with your point (and thanks for the curious incident reference), but making the point in Wikipedia, unless supported by a source, would strike me as original research. RosinDebow (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Done. Changed to "criticism" as you suggest. Moved to "personal" section as clearly not travel writing. Much better! And I realise I really should have started this discussion in the article talkpage, not yours, so will copy it there, and you can delete it from your talkpage should you wish. BrainyBabe (talk) 21:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Tourmalet

Hmm, looks like smacked botty time for me. I'd be happy if you changed it to "since... it has been" or something like that. I'd like to be able to find when the Tour introduced the hors catégorie, er, category. If it was later than the others then that could explain it. But I doubt I will, so I shall apologise for making rash assumptions! Sorry...

happy days

les Les woodland (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)les woodland

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RosinDebow. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The Festival Dancing in Your Head for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Festival Dancing in Your Head, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Festival Dancing in Your Head until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)