Your submission at Articles for creation: Iyle (February 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Romeobrown, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iyle (March 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Iyle for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iyle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iyle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:16, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sossick for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sossick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sossick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit


Unblock request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Romeobrown (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was asked to notify an account named Liz and Chukwu12345 before i could start to write an article about an artist, so i did and after creating a notable artist named Sossick by account was banned please i would like you to unblock it..Check my recent contributions to articles such as Runtown, Teckno Romeobrown (talk) 19:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

See below. Huon (talk) 01:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please Unblock Romeobrown edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Romeobrown (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have not been myself ever since my account got banned after creating two draft Sossick and Iyle both are good sourced..Before i was done with the second draft, i was told to first discuss with the accounts that have tried to create same article for more info about the person. After clicking the account with the name Chukwu12345 i was blocked. Please if it was something that i did wrong unknowingly wouldn't it be nice to pardon me just for once?,, and i promise not to repeat my mistake ever again. I just wanna be a good admin that's all. Thanks. Romeobrown (talk) 09:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

There is technical evidence linking this account to User:Chukwu12345 and several others. Abuse of multiple accounts is not permitted on Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 01:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.