Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Rlneumiller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Literaturegeek | T@1k? 00:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

If you type [[wikt:ketogenic|ketogenic]], you'll get ketogenic which is the link to Wiktionary you were looking for. However, if there is a Wikipedia article, then it's almost always better to link to that as it will contain more information.

Since Wikipedia articles are always nouns, not adjectives, we make a redirect from ketogenic to ketogenesis. As you can see, both of those take you to the same article, so you don't need to use the pipe ([[ketogenesis|ketogenic]]) in cases like this. Hope that helps. --RexxS (talk) 06:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ah... makes sense. Thanks Rlneumiller (talk) 07:22, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

National varieties of English

edit

  Hello. In a recent edit to the page Marxism, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. RolandR (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Citations referencing resources not available to the general public.

edit

What is the point of citations if the average reader is unable to access them? Specifically, many citations point to online resources that require a subscription to access. Rlneumiller (talk) 18:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Many citations are also to books, which the average reader cannot quickly access. The point of citations is not that every one of them can be quickly accessed, in that case Wikipedia might be quite shallow. But the point is that every fact on Wikipedia is verifiable, even if it takes some work to verify. We are trying to make sources more accessible, but many sources are inherently not free. If you as an editor wish to access sources for research, the WP:Wikipedia Library has institutional access to a number of paywalled sources, such as old newspapers and scientific journals. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 18:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Belated thanks for the explanation and for bringing to my attention to WP:Wikipedia Library. Rlneumiller (talk) 09:17, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply