Richardgrayson3451

May 2024 edit

Latest comment: 2 days ago10 comments6 people in discussion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:03, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for my misbehavior and believe that perhaps there is a proper way to deal with this. I got my anger the best of me. Please forgive me and i will no longer edit Wikipedia pages without understanding the policies Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

An apology is a start, but to be unblocked you will need to demonstrate an understanding of relevant policies first- especially the fact that any interested person is welcome to contribute to an article or topic. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand those policies and have read them thoroughly. I understand that it is nessacary to accept other contributions and that to first make any change attempts in the talk page. i shall see that this shall be the procedure from next time and will remove all the messages i have put that have been against the Wikipedia editors

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced that you understand how Wikipedia works. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 11:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 08:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A second chance to prove can help me make the better to contribute well for Wikipedia. if i fail then i will accept the block.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to request the unblocking of my account. I understand that my recent edits went overboard and caused damage or disruption to Wikipedia. I deeply regret my actions and acknowledge that I did not fully consider the impact of my changes on the community and the integrity of the encyclopedia.

I have taken time to reflect on my actions and understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. I am committed to making constructive and useful contributions going forward. I assure you that I will not continue to cause any damage or disruption and will focus on editing in a way that benefits the Wikipedia community.

I kindly request you to consider lifting the block on my account. I am eager to return to contributing positively and responsibly.

Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not considered.(100% certain according to GPTzero). We want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write in your own words. 331dot (talk) 13:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want to ever be able to post again, you are doing the exact wrong things. In five days, you've made *seven* unblock appeals, an absolutely absurd number, including three simultaneous ones when it's grossly improper to have more than one. And there's nothing new in any of them: you're basically saying you're sorry and you want another chance without much in the way of specifics. And, you also improperly removed a declined unblock request, meaning more time an editor had to spend because of a rule you violated.

If you actually want to return to editing Wikipedia, you need to change your approach completely. Remove your three open unblock requests and take the WP:OFFER, meaning you stay away from Wikipedia completely for six months (at a minimum). Administrators are volunteers and your unblock requests are not emergencies. You're far closer to having your talk page access removed, which makes it far less likely you'll ever be allowed to post again, than you are to being unblocked. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Richardgrayson3451 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Admisintrators

I am writing what I believe will help you understand my Wikipedia Conflict. I will Explain why I was blocked my intentions behind and how I will improve on it. I write this message with vigor and humility to ask you to review my block on the Wikipedia account and reconsider my appeal. I acknowledge my mistakes and deeply feel remorse towards the harm and discomfort I may have worthily caused or was added to the encyclopedia. I have no intention to cause any harm; therefore, I am willing to make sure that as a responsible Wikipedian, this will never happen again. To show you my commitment to the change, I would like to offer you a few steps.

First of all, I genuinely acknowledge my mistakes and my misbehavior that cost me the block. I can assure you that there is no single policy or guideline that I could justify for myself. As a member of the Wikipedia editing community, I could have brought something informative and helpful to other users, but my responsibility, conduct, and respect were not shown through my actions. I am sorry. I was hasty to change the Wikipedia page which called a Hindu symbol to a wrong figure but I recognized to first make my edits to the talk page and gain consensus to be better. I will also apologize to Mr. Doug Weller and Mr. Joshua Jonathan. I will retract my wrong statements against Wendy Doniger.

In addition, here are the steps that prove my responsible behavior: Study Policies: I assure you that I will study Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines more thoroughly and especially focus on editing, conducting, and disputing guidelines to determine what is expected of me and how to act accordingly.

Constructive writing: I will offer valuable and constructive information to the Wikipedia community, giving good-sourced information from a neutral point of view using friendly collaboration with other editors.

Guidance- request: I like to assure you that I actively seek guidance from experienced editors and mentors so that I can learn more about Wikipedia's best practices and get some of my mistakes rectified.

Open Communication: In case of misunderstanding or disagreement, I will maintain open and honest communication with fellow Wikipedians. If the necessity arises, I will address editing disputes through negotiation or professional interaction with disputing editors.

I promise that I shall abide by the above words and strive to be a better editor and Rectify my Mistakes.

I beg of you to hear my plea that everything I have done was not to Vandalize a wikipedia page or to ruin the wikipedia page rather in a hurry to correct something which felt wrong in the page as you can see I was not the only one to observe the wrong symbolism in that page.

However I do realise that I have wrongly Spoken to Mr. Joshua Jonathan and am willing to no longer to this mistake again. I am eager to know what you understand for me. Please do not ignore my appeal. Thank you for your time. I am attentive to you. Awaiting a quick and a positive response. Yours Sincerely,

User: RichardGrayson3451

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Dear Wikipedia Admisintrators
I am writing what I believe will help you understand my Wikipedia Conflict.
I will Explain why I was blocked my intentions behind and how I will improve on it.
I write this message with vigor and humility to ask you to review my block on the Wikipedia account and reconsider my appeal. I acknowledge my mistakes and deeply feel remorse towards the harm and discomfort I may have worthily caused or was added to the encyclopedia. I have no intention to cause any harm; therefore, I am willing to make sure that as a responsible Wikipedian, this will never happen again. To show you my commitment to the change, I would like to offer you a few steps.

First of all, I genuinely acknowledge my mistakes and my misbehavior that cost me the block. I can assure you that there is no single policy or guideline that I could justify for myself. As a member of the Wikipedia editing community, I could have brought something informative and helpful to other users, but my responsibility, conduct, and respect were not shown through my actions. I am sorry. I was hasty to change the Wikipedia page which called a Hindu symbol to a wrong figure but I recognized to first make my edits to the talk page and gain consensus to be better. I will also apologize to Mr. Doug Weller and Mr. Joshua Jonathan. I will retract my wrong statements against Wendy Doniger.  

In addition, here are the steps that prove my responsible behavior:
Study Policies: I assure you that I will study Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines more thoroughly and especially focus on editing, conducting, and disputing guidelines to determine what is expected of me and how to act accordingly.

Constructive writing: I will offer valuable and constructive information to the Wikipedia community, giving good-sourced information from a neutral point of view using friendly collaboration with other editors.

Guidance- request: I like to assure you that I actively seek guidance from experienced editors and mentors so that I can learn more about Wikipedia's best practices and get some of my mistakes rectified.

Open Communication: In case of misunderstanding or disagreement, I will maintain open and honest communication with fellow Wikipedians. If the necessity arises, I will address editing disputes through negotiation or professional interaction with disputing editors.

I promise that I shall abide by the above words and strive to be a better editor and Rectify my Mistakes.
 I beg of you to hear my plea that everything I have done was not to Vandalize a wikipedia page or to ruin the wikipedia page rather in a hurry to correct something which felt wrong in the page as you can see I was not the only one to observe the wrong symbolism in that page.

However I do realise that I have wrongly Spoken to Mr. Joshua Jonathan and am willing to no longer to this mistake again.
I am eager to know what you understand for me. 
Please do not ignore my appeal.
Thank you for your time. 
I am attentive to you. 
Awaiting a quick and a positive response.
Yours Sincerely,
User: RichardGrayson3451 |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Dear Wikipedia Admisintrators
I am writing what I believe will help you understand my Wikipedia Conflict.
I will Explain why I was blocked my intentions behind and how I will improve on it.
I write this message with vigor and humility to ask you to review my block on the Wikipedia account and reconsider my appeal. I acknowledge my mistakes and deeply feel remorse towards the harm and discomfort I may have worthily caused or was added to the encyclopedia. I have no intention to cause any harm; therefore, I am willing to make sure that as a responsible Wikipedian, this will never happen again. To show you my commitment to the change, I would like to offer you a few steps.

First of all, I genuinely acknowledge my mistakes and my misbehavior that cost me the block. I can assure you that there is no single policy or guideline that I could justify for myself. As a member of the Wikipedia editing community, I could have brought something informative and helpful to other users, but my responsibility, conduct, and respect were not shown through my actions. I am sorry. I was hasty to change the Wikipedia page which called a Hindu symbol to a wrong figure but I recognized to first make my edits to the talk page and gain consensus to be better. I will also apologize to Mr. Doug Weller and Mr. Joshua Jonathan. I will retract my wrong statements against Wendy Doniger.  

In addition, here are the steps that prove my responsible behavior:
Study Policies: I assure you that I will study Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines more thoroughly and especially focus on editing, conducting, and disputing guidelines to determine what is expected of me and how to act accordingly.

Constructive writing: I will offer valuable and constructive information to the Wikipedia community, giving good-sourced information from a neutral point of view using friendly collaboration with other editors.

Guidance- request: I like to assure you that I actively seek guidance from experienced editors and mentors so that I can learn more about Wikipedia's best practices and get some of my mistakes rectified.

Open Communication: In case of misunderstanding or disagreement, I will maintain open and honest communication with fellow Wikipedians. If the necessity arises, I will address editing disputes through negotiation or professional interaction with disputing editors.

I promise that I shall abide by the above words and strive to be a better editor and Rectify my Mistakes.
 I beg of you to hear my plea that everything I have done was not to Vandalize a wikipedia page or to ruin the wikipedia page rather in a hurry to correct something which felt wrong in the page as you can see I was not the only one to observe the wrong symbolism in that page.

However I do realise that I have wrongly Spoken to Mr. Joshua Jonathan and am willing to no longer to this mistake again.
I am eager to know what you understand for me. 
Please do not ignore my appeal.
Thank you for your time. 
I am attentive to you. 
Awaiting a quick and a positive response.
Yours Sincerely,
User: RichardGrayson3451 |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Dear Wikipedia Admisintrators
I am writing what I believe will help you understand my Wikipedia Conflict.
I will Explain why I was blocked my intentions behind and how I will improve on it.
I write this message with vigor and humility to ask you to review my block on the Wikipedia account and reconsider my appeal. I acknowledge my mistakes and deeply feel remorse towards the harm and discomfort I may have worthily caused or was added to the encyclopedia. I have no intention to cause any harm; therefore, I am willing to make sure that as a responsible Wikipedian, this will never happen again. To show you my commitment to the change, I would like to offer you a few steps.

First of all, I genuinely acknowledge my mistakes and my misbehavior that cost me the block. I can assure you that there is no single policy or guideline that I could justify for myself. As a member of the Wikipedia editing community, I could have brought something informative and helpful to other users, but my responsibility, conduct, and respect were not shown through my actions. I am sorry. I was hasty to change the Wikipedia page which called a Hindu symbol to a wrong figure but I recognized to first make my edits to the talk page and gain consensus to be better. I will also apologize to Mr. Doug Weller and Mr. Joshua Jonathan. I will retract my wrong statements against Wendy Doniger.  

In addition, here are the steps that prove my responsible behavior:
Study Policies: I assure you that I will study Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines more thoroughly and especially focus on editing, conducting, and disputing guidelines to determine what is expected of me and how to act accordingly.

Constructive writing: I will offer valuable and constructive information to the Wikipedia community, giving good-sourced information from a neutral point of view using friendly collaboration with other editors.

Guidance- request: I like to assure you that I actively seek guidance from experienced editors and mentors so that I can learn more about Wikipedia's best practices and get some of my mistakes rectified.

Open Communication: In case of misunderstanding or disagreement, I will maintain open and honest communication with fellow Wikipedians. If the necessity arises, I will address editing disputes through negotiation or professional interaction with disputing editors.

I promise that I shall abide by the above words and strive to be a better editor and Rectify my Mistakes.
 I beg of you to hear my plea that everything I have done was not to Vandalize a wikipedia page or to ruin the wikipedia page rather in a hurry to correct something which felt wrong in the page as you can see I was not the only one to observe the wrong symbolism in that page.

However I do realise that I have wrongly Spoken to Mr. Joshua Jonathan and am willing to no longer to this mistake again.
I am eager to know what you understand for me. 
Please do not ignore my appeal.
Thank you for your time. 
I am attentive to you. 
Awaiting a quick and a positive response.
Yours Sincerely,
User: RichardGrayson3451 |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Richardgrayson3451 (talk) 19:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic