7 day block

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for disruptive editing and competency issues. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  PhilKnight (talk) 18:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Phil unblock me please this is unfair, I have done nothing intentional to warrant this. Please unlock me @PhilKnight@wikipedia.org, We can talk by email

edit

Redzimus (talk)RedzimusRedzimus (talk) 18:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redzimus (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here- It was an accident on the talk page. I had no warning and this is unfair, please unblock me so I can at least make my case

Decline reason:

You had plenty of warnings. The next block will be longer if disruptive editing continues after this block expires. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:17, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At least he saw the bigger picture [1]

{{unblock}}

It's due to expire in ten minutes. --NeilN talk to me 18:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Voided template as no longer blocked. Welcome back after your block. PhilKnight (talk) 18:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hüseyin Cahit Firat for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hüseyin Cahit Firat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hüseyin Cahit Firat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RexxS (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ West Midlands Police, "Art thief walks out of gallery with WW1 painting", The Metro, 2014,09/17