User talk:Redvers/Archive36
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Redvers. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Did you msg me
I did not mean it as a personal attack, just fell sorry for him more than anything. The blog site I regularly visit are talking about him cause a Wikipedia user also on that site said Rodhullandemu wrote this.
<redacted>
I don't know where he wrote it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koolkittie (talk • contribs)
- It's still no excuse for what you said to him. Don't do it again. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 09:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- ok I wont I'm sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koolkittie (talk • contribs) 10:25, 28 January 2009
re: "has made few or no other edits outside this topic. "
Are you being selective in your use of the above? I notice in your comments on the cork graham deletion page that you didn't mark the original section you cut and pasted by 76.232.217.44 with "has made few or no other edits outside this topic." Yet, a review of 76.232.217.44's comments and edits are paltry and "has made few or no other edits outside this topic." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikicops (talk • contribs)
- No, I'm not being selective. The template in question doesn't apply to the nominator, just to you and your other sockpuppets who are refactoring the AfD. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 09:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello, you blocked User:Inaugration before because it was an obvious that it was a peculiar vandalism only account. It looks like this user has come back as User:KCA_2002. A perusal of the user's edits seem to be the same kind of sneaky, odd vandalism. Thought I would let you know. Thanks. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well spotted. Clearly the same user, clearly needs more rope. Blocked. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 19:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for cleaning it up. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 19:39, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
?
So will my ip be unblocked? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Metamorphis12 (talk • contribs)
- I don't know. Will it? ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 12:42, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Possible sock to User:I was tazed in the USA
Can you block Faggus22 as well, if possible? It looks like a sockpuppet. Versus22 talk 17:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Got him. Thanks! ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ dedicated to making a happy man very old 17:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
But wouldn't that the same as branding someone as a killer without evidence?
I'm fine with tracking my IP if it helps the investigation. Angdl (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Snob Scrilla
Hey Redvers, mabe you can help me out. i keep trying to update the wiki post about me, "Snob Scrilla", cause the info there is wrong and i want to post something the is in line with the rest of the info on my facebook/myspace but everytime i post you guys revert cause you think it's sombeody screwing around. is there anyway to stop this from happening? thanks heaps for your help! Snob Scrilla (talk) 00:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- You seem to have mistaken Wikipedia for MySpace. We're simply not going to let you add "he eats radcakes... he plays video games.. he wears glasses... his Wiki page is lamecor he is sorry about that..." to an encyclopedia article. ➲ redvers sit down next to me 08:19, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
5150pacer
No, not really. I don't really feel I need to, since all that was specified was "Darren Trumeter does not meet the standards for notable people" or however it went. I'm over it and you should be too; it's quite liberating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 5150pacer (talk • contribs)
- What a surprisingly unpleasant person you seem to be. Away with you. ➲ redvers sit down next to me 07:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
The page for the band Osiris
Hi I was just wondering why the page Osiris the band was delted? Yes it is/was a page about a band but why did it not fall into a catagory that was supported by "WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia." Couldbne1 (talk) 02:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Mind-reading powers are only issued to every third admin, and I missed out. You'll need to provide me with a redlink to the deleted article before I can comment. ➲ redvers sit down next to me 07:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I changed the ANI link in your closing statement to point to the archive. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
George Carroll
No, I wasn't requesting a move - just an explanation why my previous attempt to move didn't work (I've changed my mind since, as I explained)!PamD (talk) 11:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- I did both the move (I think a move was warranted) and a reply at WP:ANI. ➲ redvers sit down next to me 11:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Steak & Blow Job Day
Don't hate meat-lovers. You could have had a tofu steak, you know.... ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azarethroy (talk • contribs)
- I cook a very nice steak, I'm told. I've just never eaten one to find out. I also give a very good blow job, but that's not important right now. ➲ redvers sit down next to me 14:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Haha, ok. No worries, I've recreated the page on Uncyclopedia now anyway. Men around the world have a right to know! http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Steak_&_Blow_Job_Day —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azarethroy (talk • contribs) 17:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
We know who
Is there a technical reason you redacted it? Just curious. — neuro(talk) 19:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Mainly WP:DENY, but partially because it trips various alarms, makes saving pages difficult for unconfirmed and IP editors, makes AntiAbuseBot twitch and other such stuff. Always better to not say his name out loud! ➲ redvers sit down next to me 20:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Homeless in Philadelphia
We're not trying to ask for money, we're not part of any organization, it's a class project. Other than that is there a reason you deleted our page and could we have it back?
Drexelenglish (talk) 20:42, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- How does your class project benefit Wikipedia? ➲ redvers sit down next to me 21:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Block on Thosedarnspiders
Hi there! As I'm considering doing an RfA, I'm trying to get a better understanding of what being an admin entails. So I was wondering if you could tell me how you were sure that Thosedarnspiders who (very creatively!) vandalised MBisnaz's user talk? Don't get me wrong, I don't think you were wrong, just wondering what your thought process was after just one edit.
Personally it seemed to me that when the only edit is as vitriolic as that one, and straight onto an admin's talk page, that it was rather self-evident, but were there other checks and balances you did on top of that before making that decision? Thanks in advance! --GedUK 09:08, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nothing mystical - there are deleted contributions too, and those were what earned the sockpuppet a block :o) ➲ redvers sit down next to me 09:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ahh, i did wonder whether there were deleted contributions involved, but obviously I can't see those. Thanks for replying though! And if you have a spare few moments, I'm on editor review, and would appreciate your comments. Link at the top of my talk. --GedUK 10:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
LCN.com wiki page
Hello, you have told me to stop creating a Wiki page for LCN.com, but why can other companies in the Domain name industry have a wiki page but LCN.com cannot?
Dkamobo (talk) 11:33, 26 February 2009 (UTC) Moved this comment on behalf of user who accidentally placed it on one of your user pages --slakr\ talk / 11:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Any advice would be greatly appreciated, I also want to add a logo to the company information, any idea how I do this?
Sorry if I'm breaking any rules, I'm new to Wiki.
Holy crap.
While I was moving that comment above, that jimbo thing popped out and freaked me out. I was like, "wtf?" :P In my defense, it was late and I was high, but still... :P --slakr\ talk / 11:56, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Holy hell it did it again. I was re-reading my comment after having submitted it, and it did it again. Wow. That was sad. I'm closing the window after this. Have a good one. :P --slakr\ talk / 11:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I stole Jimbo from Krimpet. And, now He's watching everybody who writes here, the amount of vandalism of this page has dropped from very little to not very much. So that tells you something. Possibly. ➲ redvers sit down next to me 13:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Your deletion of a category and its content
I believe that the deleion of the category and its content was inappropriate. WP:DENY isn't covered by any CSD. In fact, Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages explicitly states that we should not delete these pages, as they help us for tracking purposes. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've emailed you about this. ➲ redvers see my arsenal 17:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Llanwddyn FC
I have been creating a section covering Mid Wales Football Clubs, I have just created the League Montgomeryshire League which is linked from the Welsh football league system category. When I went to add the clubs and linked the only team I have been able to create so far, Llanwddyn FC, it has been deleted!?!? For "No indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion". I though wikipedia was knowledge. How come the others can add teams in the other leagues under the Welsh football league system but mine are deleted. I would be very grateful if you could undo your unjust delete. Many Thanks User talk:timgomm 21:42, 4 March 2009 (GMT)
- Please read our guide to notability standards and provision of reliable sources, then create the article in your userspace: User:Timgomm/Llanwddyn FC so it can be reviewed. You may also want to consider being a bit less stroppy on this subject and others - Wikipedia is a community and we work together better if people don't use words like "unjust" and edit summaries like "so dont remove it again!!". ➲ redvers see my arsenal 14:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- I would be grateful then if you can send me the page that was deleted, because I really do not want to write it out again. Sorry for being stroppy, it's just everything I do seems to just get deleted. Many Thanks User talk:timgomm 20:54, 5 March 2009 (GMT)
- Which one? You created the article three times under three different titles on 30 January - Llanwddyn F.C. on the evening, Llanwddyn fc later that night and Llanwddyn FC just before midnight - this was the last one you edited 17 days later. I assume the latter is the one you want...? ➲ redvers see my arsenal 10:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I would like the last edit please Llanwddyn FC. Many Thanks User talk:timgomm 13:00, 6 March 2009 (GMT)
- It's here for you. By the way, quick shortcut for you: if you type four tildes ~~~~ the software will automagically change that to your user name, a link to your talk page and print the time and date. Saves lots of time! ➲ redvers see my arsenal 13:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks for taking the inactive tag off the ITC project. I saw it had been put on there this morning, drew a heavy sigh, and really felt that I didn't have the heart to remove it. Sometimes I feel that Wikipedia is as much to do with working alone as it is to do with collaboration. I'm still active in working on and monitoring ITC articles as much as I can. There's thankfully still lots to do, so I do feel the project still has a purpose. Anyway, thanks again - it made me smile to see someone else is still interested. Howie ☎ 09:12, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Oh, and I miss your old user page :( Howie ☎ 11:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Not sure if you're near here, but if you are, I'd really appreciate a picture...
Booker T. Washington National Monument ~ 25 miles from Roanoke. Thanks, regardless of whether you can help. dm (talk) 05:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009
— 16 March 2009- News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
- Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
GMTV Chart Show Part II: Deja Vu!
I think I've found another GMTV Chart Show puppet, calling himself CD:UK2. It shows the signs, for example the ITV-themed name, and the creation of bogus channels. For the original version, see User talk:Redvers/Archive33 and scroll down. Thanks, Malpass93 (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
: 23 March 2009
- From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
- Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
- News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)