Reazon4Exodus

Welcome!

Hello, Reazon4Exodus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! buffbills7701 21:14, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Infobox picture for actress Pamella D'Pella.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Infobox picture for actress Pamella D'Pella.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Pamella D'Pella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pamella D'Pella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamella D'Pella until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Diannaa (talk) 01:05, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pamella D'Pella.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 01:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Reazon4Exodus, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamella D'Pella closed as no consensus

Hello Reazon4Exodus,

I have closed the deletion discussion for Pamella D'Pella. The result of the discussion was no consensus. This means that after a reasonable length of discussion, there is no clear consensus (agreement) established between editors, and the discussion is closed without any action taken therefrom.

I encourage you to keep working on the article, citing reliable sources as you go to prevent the article from being renominated.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I hope you decide to stay and become a Wikipedian! Cheers, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pamella D'Pella (September 26)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pamella D'Pella.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! JSFarman (talk) 21:48, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm Antiqueight. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Pamella D'Pella, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 20:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pamella D'Pella may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Reazon4Exodus. You have new messages at Antiqueight's talk page.
Message added 20:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jprg1966 ^(talk) 20:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Pamella D'Pella - discuss

What's the problem you are having with this? The article looks fine as a start and you can reference her official web page as another source for who she is (not what she has done) - surely there has been some coverage of her in papers somewhere? As for inaccurate information - you wrote it so why not just take that out?-- 🍺 Antiqueight ^confer 20:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Reazon, I've reverted your blanking of the page. WP does not allow random blanking of articles by individual editors no matter what the reason. Please participate in a disussion about this either here or no the article talk page, so the proper processes and policies can be followed. Thanks for your patience.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:53, 10 November 2013 (UTC)