Rbayha

Your submission at Articles for creation: NIH Office of Science Policy (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NIH Office of Science Policy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Rbayha, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NIH Office of Science Policy (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NIH Office of Science Policy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 03:42, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

National Institutes of Health Office of Science Policy

National Institutes of Health Office of Science Policy is in the mainspace now.

It appears that someone unintentionally gave you some bad advice about sourcing, so just for the record: It's okay to use the NIH's website for content about the NIH. It's even okay to use, say, Coca-Cola's own website for content about Coca-Cola, Inc. However, it's best if a lot of the content can be sourced to independent sources. That helps us achieve a neutral point of view in articles, rather than a "subject's point of view". (This approach is usually more important with for-profit businesses and people than with government agencies, but I think you'll understand why we value it anyway.  :-)

If you're interested in chatting with some editors who care about medicine, then please drop by WT:MED and say hello. People like User:Bluerasberry and User:CFCF may even have some ideas about possible collaboration with the NIH. Happy editing, WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)