This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ratnahastin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
This award is given in recognition to Ratnahastin for accumulating at least 500 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Unnecessarily complicated Gears Award
This award is given in recognition to Ratnahastin for accumulating at least 150 points during each week of the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Siachen Base Camp (Pakistan) Declined Reason
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Greetings,
With reference to the page Siachen Base Camp (Pakistan) which I wrote, I recieved a notification of it being declined by you.
Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hey!
Just wanted to drop a quick message in regards to the above - I've moved your acceptance to National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy per WP:NPOVTITLE - just a curtesy note and awareness of the above if you come across similar before. I couldn't really find any sourcing using the previous title and references to "scam" seemed to not be universal in the sources the article cited.
The accepted page also had some copyvio issues and close paraphrasing which were missed on your review. It also needed substantial copyediting to get into the right state for mainspace, but I'm less worried about this as this isn't a criteria for review.
Thanks for reviewing it, however just wanted to flag up the copyvio check in particular being missed as there were several warning flags as to there being copy-paste issues - happy to discuss this offline if you wish? I messed up as well by removing them and failing to tag them for revdel, so I'm hardly perfect in this case either! Mdann52 (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm open to discussing it - especially if NEET is the common name (whether we need the year, though, is another question, see WP:DAB. Feel free to start a move discussion, however having "scam" in the title is (usually) a red flag for me. Mdann52 (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
But you have not just draftified the article. You've redirected the draft to another article which carries over no material that discusses the specific dynamic between Rajputs and Mughals. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 04:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Could you also explain why you went through a roundabout process of draftifying the page (in the process getting the original title deleted), changing the draft title, and then mainspacing the new title with "newly" created redirects from the old title? Now when you click on Rajput Mughal marriage alliances (and go to the page itself, not the Political marriages page) and check its history, it appears as though "Rajput Mughal marriage alliances" never existed and was only created by you as a redirect. I don't have much experience with forking and merging articles (the only one I've ever done is New Parliament House, New Delhi which was a fairly straightforward affair) so I want to know if this is a normal thing to do.
Lastly, I don't know why you called this section SYNTH. All of it is cited to recent books and follows a logical order (although poor in prose). WP:SYNTH refers specifically to original research that combines facts from multiple sources to make a claim that no single source did - aka doing the work of a secondary source. I do not see how that could possibly apply to the lead section that you removed. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (talk to me!/my edits) 05:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Alexandra Larosa
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I wanted to warn you that the draft that you rightly rejected (among other things badly titled but that's the least of the problems) actually replicates an article already present on the English Wikipedia, Roxelana. Sira Aspera (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Regarding deletion discussion on Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) article
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thank you for your review of my draft page. You were right: the article did come across as similar to an advertisement. I have endeavored to make the entry more encyclopedic and resubmitted the page for review. Please let me know if you would recommend additional edits. Also, please note that all of the references cited were independent and/or peer-reviewed.
This redirect was a part of large scale page move vandalism by a sockfarm [2] and subsequent hijacking as a caste article [3]. But I think you're correct,i should've restored this revision instead. Ratnahastin(talk)15:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Artemis 6
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rajiv Dixit. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!
You scored 300 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this citation barnstar. Thanks for helping out!
Yes, please do something about me improving articles and voting with policy-based arguments in deletion discussions. I can assure you me and Imperial are not pushing a "Muslim POV"; additionally mentioning their instagram group is WP:OUTING, which is not allowed here. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
not pushing muslim pov?? What's this? In Mewar-Delhi wars Both you and imperial are on same sides arguing to delete this page, meanwhile Here Maratha-Nizam wars imperial and a sock of adityanakul, Deepstonev are arguing to keep the page. literally more than half of your and imperial's edits are based on muslims. 2409:4085:1E03:E54C:192:38AF:4B56:E1BB (talk) 03:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
"Are based on muslims"? Editing in a topic area related to former Muslim states in no way means I or Imperial are trying to push a "Muslim POV"; just because socks happened to vote the same way I or Imperial have in no way means we are connected to them. As you clearly fall into one of the sockfarm groups which oppose the AdityaNakul group (as otherwise your first edits wouldn't be accusing someone of being a sock from that group), would you mind sharing with us which one you are a member of? InfoHistoric23, Mr Anonymous 699, R2dra, or another group? Or are they all connected? Thanks. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 03:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm just a regular wikipedia reader. Yes your edits are based on muslims check your own contributions. You and your meatpuppet User:Dooblts disscussed to change the name of Vijayanagar empire to Vijayanagar Kingdom to exploit hindu history here and your meatpuppet left a message on your user talk to delete battles of idar and rana sanga's invasion of Gujrat pages in order to exploit rajput history here. 2409:4085:1E03:E54C:192:38AF:4B56:E1BB (talk) 04:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I wasn't "defending" those sock puppets; I made that statement because there wasn't enough evidence presented by Based Kashmiri (who also turned out to be a sock) at the time to support that they were socks, which they did turn out to be, which is fine. I also replied to Dooblts that a name change to "Vijayanagar Kingdom" would not be appropriate under WP:COMMONNAME; I was not conspiring some evil plot with him to downplay the strength of Vijayanagara, and those messages on my talk page were due to past interactions I had with DeepstoneV before I knew he was a sock, as Dooblts is likely a sock of Adityanakul as you said, or else I don't see why he would know to contact me. You're not fooling anyone here that you're just some innocent Wikipedia reader, and those pings are highly unnecessary. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 04:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
There has been a mess with many Rajput articles that went unnoticed for years. When I started pointing out this mess, you got upset. First, you need to stop your mentality of religious polarization. Exploiting Hindu history seriously?. If you don't address this, you'll keep focusing on it unnecessarily, which isn't a big deal. Dooblts (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey there, welcome to the 25th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 March 2024. We've got a ton of wonderful editors taking back their pitchforks today. Don't worry, for they come in peace, to forcibly fix and extend existing scripts you use with sheer passion. There's so many, them forks have got what's basically their own column now! gift us with some rows before it's too late Aaron Liu (talk) 04:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
To a lesser extent, the same goes for PrimeHunter/Search sort. I wish someone would integrate the sorts into the sort menu instead of adding 11 portlet links.
An easily configurable script to add a link to the #p-vector-user-menu-overflow portlet with a name, target, and icon. This one should be a relatively easier one. I would do it myself, but I'm too busy rotting away on Celeste (video game).
After the ＲＩＩＪ update, Aaron Liu: Watchlyst Greybar Unsin has a dismiss button that allows you to mark an item as read in one click and cycle to the next Watchlist item.
Lordseriouspig/StatusChangerImproved is just like Enterprisey's script, except you select your status from a dropdown instead of cycling through them with a button. The WMF operates out of car-centric infrastructure anyway. Shame!
Newly maintained scripts
Aaron Liu has created Duplinks from Evad37/duplinks-alt; his fork adds a config variable to automatically highlight duplicate links on the loading of any page where the portlet link would've appeared.
Tired of staring at a bunch of filtering text and waiting for darn filter logs to load? Msz2001/AbuseFilter analyzer can parse abuse filters into a visual syntax tree and evaluate locally on-demand!
Polygnotus/DuplicateReferences finds references with the same link and displays the number of them along with a button to add the {{duplicated citations}} tag under the references section. Being lazy has never been easier!
fastest gun on the net Ponor/really-quick-block really quick add to contribution lists three buttons awesome
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
1Hey there, I just want to confirm why hypothetical you rapidly attempting to revert valid pointers reflection Gahlot Jats On the greater extend this article was original objective was Gahlot but in present circumstances without any dedicated consensus someone change the Ghalot to guhila without discussing with other editors seem suspicious anyway what your acquisition, it can have better outcomes if we reinstate guhila to gahlot article version
No such battle named Mughal conquest of Mewar ever happened, Shah Jahan harrassed local civilians but no battle happened.
this wasn't military conflict, it was a treaty signed by Amar Singh, you can confirm from the article it doesn't have anything written about this battle but a military infobox is used
According to the treaty Chittorgarh was returned to Amar Singh so how is it a Mughal victory.
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The edit was very much warranted to give the historical personality who has a lot of respect in India his due
If you are arguing from neutrality point of view I have used the same exact word as was used for jawaharlal nehru. Further in the wikipedia page of Nathuram godse,M K Gandhi has beend referred to as Mahatma. This smells of selective neutrality which is not neutrality at all Osalil (talk) 03:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
It is written there that Savarkar had written mercy petitions to the British government and accepted their legitimacy. Thus, he cannot be called an "anti-colonial nationalist", unlike Jawaharlal Nehru who played a significant role in eliminating the British rule.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Sock
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello bro, WhiteReaperPM has returned,GroovyGrinster making same edits like Whitereaper, creating pages with maratha victory, creating pages of Malik Kafur and Khijli invasions. Even pushing Marattat pov on Battle of Purander 1. Please reach out any admin as no action is still taken on his soc investigation page 2409:4052:4D81:F6D6:C993:C6BA:5EA:4F31 (talk) 12:17, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Thank you my friend from north of vindhyas. I love swapna vasaavadatta very much. But then my ancestors were under Pulikesin II ("rendava pulakeshi" in Telugu) who stopped Harsha Vardhana enreing the south. Do you consider south of vindhya folks as dasyu?
In any case, I will report you for bigotry, "Western government" supremacism, referencing Ravish Kumar's Wikipedia page. You very well know that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Telugujoshi (talk) 03:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia (including The Signpost)
WP:RSPWP 📌 Generally unreliable +22[bq]
2024
Wikipedia is not a reliable source because open wikis are self-published sources. This includes articles, non-article pages, The Signpost, non-English Wikipedias, Wikipedia Books, and Wikipedia mirrors; see WP:CIRCULAR for guidance.[27] Occasionally, inexperienced editors may unintentionally cite the Wikipedia article about a publication instead of the publication itself; in these cases, fix the citation instead of removing it. Although citing Wikipedia as a source is against policy, content can be copied between articles with proper attribution; see WP:COPYWITHIN for instructions. Telugujoshi (talk) 03:42, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
September 2024
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent editing history at Port Blair shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The Bannertalk13:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello @Ratnahastin, I have concern regarding 2 pages
1. Khijli invasion of Jaisalmer, here 4 sources are used multiple times, 2nd 3rd and 4th sources aren't even history sources and 1st source is used more than 10 times. And even the author mentions that "no Muslim chronicle mentions about this battle but local ballads do", this page doesn't even have a single reliable source.
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Your revert actions on the RC Majumdar
Latest comment: 29 days ago8 comments4 people in discussion
Your citations on Majumdar being a Hindu Nationalist do not comply with Wikipedias rule of conduct. They mention this in passing rather then proving it to be fact. Furthermore future references (Ahir, 2022) also contradict the same. 2409:40D0:C:D15:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 05:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Furthermore the references cited by You are not academic in nature, which in itself is not a problem if proper methodology is used which unfortunately is not used, furthermore no citation exist in Your references. I have upgraded the article with credible academic references. 2409:40D0:C:D15:1DD2:481:5588:869D (talk) 06:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
They are not stating a "common fact". No historian considers Majumdar a Hindu Nationalist, a nationalist yes but not a hindu nationalist. The sources makes a revisionist claim and does not justify it at all rather just mentions it in passing. Your source (Ahir, 2018) mentions Majumdar as a Nationalist historian and not a Hindu nationalist, these are not light words to throw around and your sources do not justify it at all. Nothingbutthetruth2006 (talk) 08:58, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
I am not any falsifying sources. You on the other hand are using sources that do not prove anything and act as nothing more then empty fodder, Furthermore the Ahir, 2018 refers to "History Of Modern India" (Spectrum). Which is used as a citation for the claim that he primarly studied Indian history. In that book he is clearly referred to as a "Nationalist" historian while the section of "Communalist" historians also exist where he is not classified as such. Your own sources contradict your claims of him being a Hindu Nationalist (for which to begin with your sources are very weak to begin with). They do not prove that he was a Hindu Nationalist, they just mention it in passing and is expected to be treated as gospel. My sources explain his classification and his contributions to the field, kindly get better sources. Nothingbutthetruth2006 (talk) 15:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Yes you are falsifying sources by falsifying their authenticity and that is disruptive editing. Similarly, you are still falsely claiming that "Your own sources contradict your claims of him being a Hindu Nationalist" when no such sources have been used by me until now. It has been already proven it to you that Ahir2018 was nowhere used for claiming him to be Hindu nationalist. It does not say anything like "Majumdar was not a Hindu nationalist but a nationalist" contrary to your deceptive claims. Ratnahastin(talk)15:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Perhaps You should reread what I wrote I wrote if You can read it again that (Ahir, 2018) which is directly cited after the claim that he was a Hindu nationalist for the claim that he studied the history of India clearly mention that HE WAS NOT A COMMUNALIST, the citations after your claim that he was promoting communalist historiography relieve him of this argument. Clearly you dont know what Disruptive Editing means, I am actually making the article better by citing PROPER AUTHENTIC ACADEMIC SOURCES as opposed to your fundamentally hollow citations. Nothingbutthetruth2006 (talk) 18:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Lets Make Some Edits to the RC Majumdar Piece which will provide a more nuanced view.
Latest comment: 28 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
What if we create a new subsection titled "Legacy" in which we discuss his legacy on the history profession of india. we can discuss both his appreciates and his critics. Nothingbutthetruth2006 (talk) 16:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Sock of Anujror
Latest comment: 27 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In 1943, the Mandal started a Marathi quarterly— Yadava Patnka —in Bombay, with S.V. Bhalekar, K.K. Khedekar and J.R. Yadava as editors. In 1946 they formed a trust and Yadavas of Bombay, Pune, Thana, Kathiawad and Kolhapur contributed open-heartedly, prominent donors were M.B. Kotkar Brothers (Bombay), Shanta Ram, Shamarao Ghole and Kashinath Gandpat Dage of Pune, and Bhalekar Brothers and Kamble Brothers of Bombay. Most of the Yddavas had associated themselves with the Marathas in the past, but they are trying to segregate themselves from that group and are establishing their independent identity as Yadavas.
@Fylindfotberserk:, I'm uncertain about reliability of the source too. Given that author identifies himself to be a member of the Yadav caste and there being no evidence of them being a historian,they have also worked with The All India Yadava Mahasabha, a caste organisation as per the preface.[6]
Also claims such as these:
Majority of the historians held false notions about this caste. Some scholars relying upon some puranic description held the view that ‘all the Yadavas perished in the fratricidal war at Dwaraka’, and hence there survived no Yadava. It is great fallacy and the historians have always misguided and misinterpreted this wrong notion. Yadavas, even in the days of Sri Krsna were divided in various branches and inhabited many different parts of India. So how could they all perish at one time and at one place? The Present study is an humble effort to sweep these misnomers and false notions
Latest comment: 19 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hey, did you see this? I have known about the SPI from the start since a CU mentioned it to me in a related discussion. I didn't comment on it because I didn't think it was worth my time. – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@DreamRimmer: No, I was not aware of it at all but thanks for notifying ,I have added it to my watchlist. Also I do agree with checkuser's assessment that filer was a sock, I agree that the filer belonged to Hindukshatrana sockfarm.Ratnahastin(talk)03:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, maybe they are trying to block us because we both filed SPI reports on those socks from this sockfarm. Those caste warriors are just wild, lol. – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:27, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Akshardham NJ
Latest comment: 16 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The talk page discussions and previous editorial consensus have determined that the lawsuit in question does not warrant inclusion in the article's introduction. This decision is based on several factors:
The lawsuit is not considered sufficiently relevant to the subject's primary notability.
There are discrepancies in the allegations and facts surrounding the case.
The information is already adequately covered in the article's history section.
As per the Wikipedia guideline WP:LEADCITE (Lead section guidelines), only the most salient and crucial information should be presented in the lead. This guideline advises against including peripheral details or contentious matters that are not central to the subject's notability in the introductory section.
The lawsuit has been appropriately documented in the article's body for a considerable period, which adheres to Wikipedia's content organization principles. Adding it to the introduction would be redundant and potentially overemphasize its importance relative to other aspects of the subject. Ram112313 (talk) 07:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Deletion of contents on INSEAD
Latest comment: 13 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi,
I found that you deleted more than 6000 characters that I added. To my view, the contents are well written and cited. Some of those contents I did align with another admin before posting. I would appreciate your constructive criticism on how to improve the contents instead of just outright deleting them, in Wikipedia spirits.
Are you up for such discussion?
Here are the points for discussion
My update of the Chairman to the latest effect. Can you let me know why the update of the change of personnel is promotional? How to improve?
| chairman = [[KristinAndreas Skogen LundJacobs]]<ref>{{Cite news |last=HuangGallezo-Estaura |first=AileenKrisana |date=614 JuneJanuary 20242015 |title=Mrs.Meet Kristin Skogen Lund has beenINSEAD's appointednew Chairpersonchairman of the Boardboard of |url=http://sbr.com.sg/hr-education/exclusive/meet-insead%E2%80%99s-new-chairman-board Andreas |url-status=live |archive-url=https://wwwweb.inseadarchive.eduorg/newsweb/mrs20221201135751/https://sbr.com.sg/hr-kristin-skogen-lund-has-been-appointed-chairperson-board-directorseducation/exclusive/meet-insead%E2%80%99s-succeednew-mrchairman-andreas |archive-date=1 SeptemberDecember 2024 |access-date=5 October 2024board |publisher=INSEAD2022}}</ref>
The Name section: This section is purely about noting that Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires is an obsolete name. How it is promotional and how to imrpove?
== The name ==
The name INSEAD was a contraction of "'''Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires'''" ({{Literal translation|European Institute of Business Administration}})<ref>{{cite web |title=INSEAD Definition |url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/insead.asp#:~:text=Founded%20in%201957%2C%20INSEAD%20is,d'Administration%20des%20Affaires%22 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210414025109/https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/insead.asp#:~:text=Founded%20in%201957%2C%20INSEAD%20is,d'Administration%20des%20Affaires%22 |archive-date=14 April 2021 |access-date=13 April 2021 |publisher=Investopedia}}</ref>. However, after its opening of an Asia campus in early 2000s and its repositioning for a global mission , the university began to avoid using its old name, which included the specific place name "Europe". Now, only "INSEAD" is recognized as its official name <ref>{{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927005151/http://www.insead.edu/alumni/career_services/index.htm|title=About Career Services for Graduates - INSEAD Official Website|date=2007年09月27日}}</ref>. The current logo has INSEAD wrapped in a circled filled with green, representing [[the globe]] and tagline "Business School for the World", signaling its global mission.
<references />
Remake of the intro: I just summarize the fact from other sections. All with citation of third party sources. To me, they are factual summary of how business community know about the school. How can I improve to state the fact while make it neutral? Also, I deleted the old name for obsoletion reason. I guess this should not be reverted.
'''INSEAD''' ({{IPAc-en|ɪ|n|s|iː|æ|d}} {{respell|IN|see|ad}}),<ref>{{cite web |last1=Patil |first1=Pratyush |title=How to pronounce INSEAD? |url=https://intheknow.insead.edu/blog/how-pronounce-insead |publisher=INSEAD |access-date=23 April 2024 |archive-date=23 April 2024 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240423213111/https://intheknow.insead.edu/blog/how-pronounce-insead |url-status=live }}</ref> is a non-profit [[Postgraduate education|graduate]] [[business school]] that maintains campuses in France (Europe Campus), Singapore (Asia Campus), and the United Arab Emirates (Middle East Campus). INSEAD is associated with [[Sorbonne University]] and in a strategic alliance with [[The Wharton School]]. The school is known for its emphasis on [[internationalism]], its advocacy for [[globalization]] and [[sustainability]] in business<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ethier |first=Marc |date=18 December 2023 |title=Poets&Quants' MBA Program Of The Year For 2023: INSEAD |url=https://poetsandquants.com/2023/12/18/poetsquants-mba-program-of-the-year-for-2023-insead/ |access-date=6 September 2024 |website=Poets&Quants |language=en-US}}</ref>, and [[List of INSEAD alumni|successful alumni]] in [[corporate]],<ref>{{cite news |title=Where did FT500 chief executives go to business school |newspaper=Financial Times|date=22 January 2016|url=https://www.ft.com/content/3a63c054-b885-11e5-b151-8e15c9a029fb |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221210/https://www.ft.com/content/3a63c054-b885-11e5-b151-8e15c9a029fb |archive-date=10 December 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|last1=Palin|first1=Adam}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Goldberg |first=Robyn |date=14 September 2022 |title=University Alumni Rankings of the Wealthy and Influential 2022 |url=https://altrata.com/reports/university-alumni-report-2022/ |access-date=23 September 2022 |website=Altrata |archive-date=20 September 2022 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20220920051105/https://altrata.com/reports/university-alumni-report-2022/ |url-status=live }}</ref> [[entrepreneurship]]<ref>https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/pitchbook-university-rankings {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240531045644/https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/pitchbook-university-rankings |date=31 May 2024 }} {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref><ref>https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/pitchbook-university-rankings {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240531045644/https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/pitchbook-university-rankings |date=31 May 2024 }} {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url=https://poetsandquantsforexecs.com/uncategorized/poetsquants-top-100-mba-startups-of-2023/2/ | title=Poets&Quants' Top 100 MBA Startups of 2023 | date=3 October 2023 | access-date=24 May 2024 | archive-date=4 June 2024 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240604230229/https://poetsandquantsforexecs.com/uncategorized/poetsquants-top-100-mba-startups-of-2023/2/ | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>https://sifted.eu/articles/unicorn-universities {{Webarchive|url=https://archive.today/20240103114330/https://sifted.eu/articles/unicorn-universities|date=3 January 2024}} {{Bare URL inline|date=August 2024}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=10 Years Saudi Arabia Founders Report |url=https://magnitt.com/research/10Y-saudi-arabia-founders-report-50931?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=philip&utm_campaign=2024foundersreport |access-date=15 September 2024 |website=magnitt.com}}</ref> and [[politics]].
There are other edits as well which I think are all good-willed reorganization of data.
The changes you did to lead were promotional, especially this statement "and successful alumni in corporate,entrepreneurship and politics." You also removed the COI template[7] with a false edit summary that no discussion was initiated on the talkpage when clearly there was [8], can you explain why you did that? Ratnahastin(talk)12:34, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Sock
Latest comment: 9 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 6 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi,
I tried to continue the talk but they don't seem to be editable anymore. So let's continue here
1. For the COI tag, if you check history you can see that the admins (I don't know if that's the right way to call them), GuardianH and Drmies have edited intensively after the discussion on the talk page. They have since also stopped revision or any discussion. As an amateur editor, I understand that they completed their addressing of the issues with contents.
2. For the introduction part where you said to be promotional. As I said, I summarized the fact from the Rankings and Reputation section that was edited by various admin, GuardianH and Drmies and JustAnotherWikiEditor, whom I talked to briefly. If you don't think the summary is justified, Let me know your suggestion for edit or just delete?
Latest comment: 2 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I saw that you removed my contributions (specifically His teachings section) in the Aniruddhacharya page. I have well researched and I have took reference from the original Aniruddhacharya's official website, and I will definitely share the link if you want to research. Please look into this matter and tell me what I wrote wrong. Thanks for your precious time Kharavela Deva (talk) 08:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rajiv Dixit. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Confirmed sock of AdityaNakul. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 00:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
Improve a script
Requested scripts
Updated scripts
Newly maintained scripts
New scripts
