Welcome to Wikipedia!

edit

Hello, Randfal2, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 03:15, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Richard Koch

edit

Excuse me but I was already working on the Richard Koch article when you started editing it. I had the banner up an everything and have it under working in the drive page. HRouillier (talk) 05:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Spelling of Indian topics

edit

The article is identified as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Use_British_English_from_July_2012

thanks JarrahTree 03:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2017

edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tobacco marketing and African Americans, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't change spellings inside direct quotes or inside reference titles. Meters (talk) 00:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Euphemism, may be confused with vandalism. Please stop making these changes. Don't change spellings or hyphenations just because you prefer a different version or think that you know better. From what I have seen you don't know better. And don't ever change direct quotes, the titles of published sources, or material that is sourced unless you verify the original source (I'm assuming that you are not an expert in Proto-Indo-European language and didn't read the source before you changed *skined- to *skinned- )[1] Meters (talk) 00:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Ringe, Don (2006). From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-955229-0.

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Scrippelle.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Scrippelle.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:45, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Dates

edit

Can you please stop adding commas in-between the month and year of dates, as this goes against policy at MOS:DATE. -- AxG /   17:15, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I agree, and would make the same general observation about commas in text. Many are unnecessary, and disrupt the flow of the sentence. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Addition of definite and indefinite articles

edit

Please take greater care when you think to add definite and indefinite articles to the prose. In some cases the original text was entirely proper, and read better without, the article. (For example, "through a process known as retrocession" is worse with an indefinite article before "retrocession".) In other instances the change is just wrong, e.g., the definite article before the name of a court case - "the Supreme Court held in the District of Columbia v. Heller". Rather than make these changes mechanically, you should take care to read the text after your edit to ensure that it is, in fact, better - and correct. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 13:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

I am noticing that this is still a problem. Might you consider avoiding this type of edit? Thanks! Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Nora Platiel

edit

Hi, I'm DBigXray. Randfal2, thanks for creating Nora Platiel!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Need more categories. based on citizenship etc.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

DBigXray 13:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Maria Raschke) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Maria Raschke, Randfal2!

Wikipedia editor 1l2l3k just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article, please expand a little more, provided that you have the sources to do it. I am not concerned about notability, given what the article says, but its expansion will be good to the reader as to what exactly her work on womens' rights was, as well as some more detail within her practice as a lawyer. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on 1l2l3k's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

1l2l3k (talk) 19:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Camilla Jellinek) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Camilla Jellinek, Randfal2!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Camilla Jellinek.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 02:11, 23 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Maria Bredow

edit

Hello Randfal2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Maria Bredow for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

AmericanAir88(talk) 15:39, 26 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Clara Klabunde) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Clara Klabunde, Randfal2!

Wikipedia editor SkyGazer 512 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work! Quick tip: When you create articles, put the following coding in them, so that the references will display properly:

== References ==
{{reflist}}

It should be put after the normal prose and sections, but before an external link section, categories, and nav templates. I've already added this for you in this case, and I think others have for all of the previous articles you created.

To reply, leave a comment on SkyGazer 512's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 17:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swisscom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Global 2000 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Sergei Lemberg

edit

Hello, Randfal2,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sergei Lemberg should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergei Lemberg .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Vexations (talk) 16:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Hildegard Damerius) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Hildegard Damerius, Randfal2!

Wikipedia editor Vexations just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

If you translate a page please credit the author of the original page by adding a translated page template to the talk page of the translation.

To reply, leave a comment on Vexations's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Vexations (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Renate Lenz-Fuchs

edit

"Renate Lenz-Fuchs (born April 19, 1910 in Diez, died June 23, 2001 ibid)..."

Since ibid means "same as the previous reference", and there is no previous reference, it raises the strong suspicion that the text has been copied from somewhere and is probably a copyright violation. Could you clarify please? Cabayi (talk) 10:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

I see from the German article's history that de:User:Färber used it to mean that she was born and died in the same town. Ibid is for references, nothing else, and certainly not birthplaces. Please be more careful with your translations. Cabayi (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Frida Katz

edit

Hi and thanks for creating Frida Katz. Please note that when you create an article based on a translation of an article on another language Wikipedia (nl:Frida Katz in this case), you must give attribution to the original source. Do have a look through WP:CWW and follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I see that this issue has already been brought up on your talk page before, and a quick look through your previous articles shows that you've been repeatedly translating articles without attribution. Providing attribution is a copyright requirement and repeated copyright violations can get you blocked from editing. So please take note of this. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Bennv3771 -- Can you please clarify what you mean about "without attribution"? I cite some of the original references. I see from "Copying within Wikipedia", and in the future, I'll mention the original source in the edit notes. To be clear, I've been trying to add stubs in English for various notable people with non-English pages. Randfal2 (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rollback

edit

I accidentally misclicked on the rollback button at Elizabeth II. I intended to only undo your edits per MOS:LQ and MOS:ENGVAR. DrKay (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Zita Zehner) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Zita Zehner.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Please add only red-linked categories.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Ilse Schmidt

edit

Thanks for creating Ilse Schmidt.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please add references, preferably WP:INLINECITED. 'Literature' is ambiguous on English Wikipedia - are they your sources, or is it just a suggested reading section?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 08:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Randfal2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Regina Quintanilha

edit

Hello, Randfal2,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Regina Quintanilha! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This page can be expanded with content from the Portuguese Wikipedia. Check the tag on the page for details. Thank you!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 06:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Accursia

edit

Hello, Randfal2,

Thanks for creating Accursia! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks for your new article on Accursia, though I recommend finding ways to show that she was notable in history, especially when her existence is unconfirmed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bersiap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batavia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

edit

Thank you for your recent articles, including Maria Staniszkis, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Valborg Stoud Platou (Q17120135)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Valborg Stoud Platou (Q17120135). Since you had some involvement with the Valborg Stoud Platou (Q17120135) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Henriette Geertruida Veth

edit

Hello, Randfal2,

Thank you for creating Henriette Geertruida Veth.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on Henriette Geertruida Veth. Note that it is currently an "Orphan", meaning that no other Wikipedia articles link TO it. This makes the article tough to find for interested readers. See WP:DE-ORPHAN for pointers.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply