Radicuil

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Radicuil, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Schwede66 09:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rangituhi / Colonial Knob has been accepted

Rangituhi / Colonial Knob, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Schwede66 15:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

GG Armorial

Thank you for creating this page. I was dismayed in 2020 when so many articles of this type were purged and I'm glad to see them returning. Robin S. Taylor (talk) 12:23, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Armorial of the governors-general of New Zealand. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:17, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for pointing that out. I have expanded on the attribution you added to Armorial of the governors-general of New Zealand, and also added one to Armorial of the governors general of Canada. Unfortunately, the nature of blazons of arms and the particular language they use is that there are only so many ways they can be phrased, hence why they have largely been carried over from the sources verbatim.--Radicuil (talk) 12:30, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

I agree, blazons should not for the most part be re-worded, as they use a particular language that should not be altered. Where they are not public domain, please use quotations. — Diannaa (talk) 13:30, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Armorial of the governors general of Canada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Armorial of the governors general of Canada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.gg.ca/en/heraldry/public-register/project/2887, https://www.gg.ca/en/heraldry/public-register/project/1824, and https://www.gg.ca/en/heraldry/public-register/project/929. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 12:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Fram. I'm hoping that this can be resolved without the entire page being deleted?

The parts that have been copied from the The Public Register of Arms, Flags, and Badges of Canada are the blazons for the achievements of more recent governors general of Canada. As mentioned in my chat above with Dianaa, the particular language used in blazons means that we are limited in terms of how we could paraphrase them.

Would attributing the text for those particular blazons as quotes from the source be sufficient to overcome this issue? And if so, what would be the best way to do this?

If that's not enough, is there perhaps another option that wouldn't involve deleting the whole page or a significant proportion of the information for the governors general post-1950?

I won't be able to address anything further tonight, and I possibly won't be able to get around to anything until Wednesday.--Radicuil (talk) 13:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Are there third-party sources about these armorials? If not, then why do we have this article? Do we even need the exact description as given by the website? We have the image, just explaining what the main motive is should be sufficient without the exact text. I mean, when you have the entry for Julie Payette, I can see that it has a wing, a crown, and black and blue. No need to give the exact heraldric formulation for this. But why does it have these symbols? If all you want to do is show them, then it should be a Commons category, not a Wikipedia article. If you want to give background, content, explanation, from independent sources, then it can be a Wikipedia article. As it stands, it is just a long list of copyrighted text and images (well, people have tried to avoid the copyright issue of the images by redrawing the arms of e.g. Michaëlle Jean, resulting in what is basically incorrect information, something made up by a random editor with a vague resemblance to the real deal.[1] vs. [2]? Fram (talk) 13:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry for not replying sooner, though I see that the deletion nomination has now been removed?

As you will notice, all of the earlier achievements do have 3rd party public domain sources.

In my experience, for more recent achievements it can be quite difficult to find reliable sources for them and/or their blazons. Though perhaps I am not looking in quite the right places, or don't have access to the best sources? While I do have an interest in the subject of heraldry, for me editing is really a casual hobby, so I'm not about to go to libraries, or buy books on heraldry or subscribe to any journals. So I have to rely on what I can find publicly available online.

Luckily in that respect, unlike other countries Canada has the The Public Register of Arms, Flags, and Badges of Canada, hence my use of that as a source for many of the later blazons.

If you or anyone else is able to find other reliable sources, feel absolutely free to cite them on the page.

With respect, it is my understanding (though I am no expert on heraldry) that the blazons are usually more definitive than any particular depiction, which are up to the particular interpretation of the blazon by the artist. So, I don't think you should be accusing the people who rendered those images as providing "incorrect information", as that is their interpretation, including all the features required by the blazon, without merely copying the image created by the Canadian Heraldic Authority.--Radicuil (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages or pinging to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Talk:Kapiti Coast District. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. GenQuest ^"scribble" 05:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Just a friendly reminder that you shouldn't do that. Cheers, GenQuest ^"scribble" 05:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

All I was trying to do was to ping a potentially interested user as per the instructions given on the Merging page, but okay.--Radicuil (talk) 05:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Hutt City Council logo.svg

The file File:Hutt City Council logo.svg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hutt City Council logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hutt City Council logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay

Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hutt City Council logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hutt City Council logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:12, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

@Minorax Sorry, I'm confused. This image is currently being used on the Hutt City Council page, still there from when I added it on 4 November, so I'm not sure why you're saying it's an orphaned image? Radicuil (talk) 07:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)