Pra3155, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Pra3155! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mancherial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Kyathanpally, Mancherial district moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Kyathanpally, Mancherial district, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 12:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Kyathanpally, Mancherial district concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kyathanpally, Mancherial district, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kyathampally

edit
 

Hello, Pra3155. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kyathampally".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kyathanpally, Mancherial district

edit
 

Hello, Pra3155. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kyathanpally".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 18:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mancherial have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mancherial, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mancherial district, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Your recent edit to Mancherial appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I know Mancherial City Wikipedia has complete details of tourism economy please once check Pra3155 (talk) 13:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mancherial district, you may be blocked from editing.
It was clearly explained, above, that you should not add names to lists, unless they already have their own article on the English Wikipedia, but you have continued doing so. Please stop - Arjayay (talk) 10:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mancherial. - Arjayay (talk) 10:37, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mancherial, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 14:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 11:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello Pra3155! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mancherial have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 06:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Gandhari khilla.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Gandhari khilla.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mancherial.
You have received multiple final warnings about unsourced additions, but are still making them. Please stop before you are blocked - Arjayay (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Definitely I don’t do unnownsources Pra3155 (talk) 09:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I didn’t unnownsourceed about mancherial Pra3155 (talk) 09:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Mancherial. - Arjayay (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ok thank u stopped without unnown sources editing Pra3155 (talk) 09:25, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Please help me unblock my ip adress Pra3155 (talk) 09:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mancherial district. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 08:11, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you I don't do again unnown sources about Mancherial District Pra3155 (talk) 10:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Why you banned from appeals my account??? Pra3155 (talk) 10:57, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pra3155 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

Procedural decline, duplicate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 10:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pra3155 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Unfortunatly I created mancherial medical college article please unblock my accountPra3155 (talk)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I fixed your request for proper display. You must write it exactly as indicated. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Government Medical College, Mancherial (November 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
I this article created unknown sources please delete this article Pra3155 (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

{{Unblock=Disrup=I has been blocked new article on mancherial medical collegePra3155 (talk)}}}

I have been blocked by PhilKnight, because I had created Mancherial medical College poor sources that's why I have been blocked. I don't behaviour dangerous and attacked please consider my request for unblocking thank your.

Unblocking

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pra3155 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Disruptive editing = I has been blocked new article on mancherial medical collegePra3155 (talk)

Decline reason:

Malformed, stale request and not compelling reason to overturn. Daniel (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have been blocked by PhilKnight, because I had created Mancherial medical College poor sources that's why I have been blocked. I don't behaviour dangerous and attacked please consider my request for unblocking thank your. =I has been blocked new article on mancherial medical collegesPra3155 (talk)}}

I have been blocked by [[PhilKnight, because I had created Mancherial medical College poor sources that's why I have been blocked. I don't behaviour dangerous and attacked please consider my request for unblocking thank you. Pra3155 (talk) 07:25, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

See WP:GAB to understand how to use the unblock template properly. --Yamla (talk) 10:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Yamla Please help me how to insert unblock request Pra3155 (talk) 06:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
WP:GAB explains how to write an unblock request. You don't appear to have sufficient understanding of English to be able to properly communicate here. You may be better off writing in the native language version of Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 10:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply