Pornfreak1

Referencing

Hey, I see you've been trying to add sources to articles by adding (("name")) to the bottom of pages. That is not how sourcing works on Wikipedia. If you'd like to learn more, I suggest you read WP:REFB as it has a lot of useful information. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Anarchyte. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fuat Kalkan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:08, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pornfreak1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Pornfreak1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

• The article JENA JENATO did not provide any reason to regard its subject as sufficiently significant to be the subject of a Wikipedia article. I suggest checking the notability guidelines to see what sort of thing is required. The article has been deleted. There were also several other reasons why the page was not suitable as a Wikipedia article, including a lack of coherent structure. My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:16, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours to the page Erin Moran has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Also note that this is an encyclopedia, not a text message. Rules of capitalization apply. Sundayclose (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Erin Moran, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Pornfreak1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jena, jena jenato, actress, model, teacher, writer,activist.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:Jena, jena jenato, actress, model, teacher, writer,activist.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 20:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC)