User talk:PokestarFan/Archive 6 1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) in topic Wikidata weekly summary #205

New Year's Resolution

I will try not to be as disruptive or make copyright violations

ClueBot III

How can I get cluebot to archive all the sections after there are 10 of them? They can be any number of days old as long as there are 10. Is this is possible? PokestarFan (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

See this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ClueBot_III). I don't think its possible that they can be any number of days old before they get archived, because one of the required fields is "Age", and this can be how many hours a section is left unanswered before it gets archived. Hope this helps. Class455fan1 (talk to me) 17:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
@Class455fan1: I believe you would use the field "minarchthreads=10". Mkdwtalk 21:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Finding subpages

Is there a quick way to find all the subpages that are within my userspace? Thanks. This is PokestarFan's signature. I have commented on your page. My Talk My Blocks Time is: 00:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

On your contributions page at the bottom is a link that says Subpages. That will bring you here which will list all the subpages of your user space. You can then toggle between user space and user talk space or just go here to see all the subpages of your user talk space. --Majora (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Coor

Can I get a editnotice template(with colors) so that I can tweak it? I really don't understand the styling in HTML and Wikipedia.

Mine has colours, but I don't know if that's what you are looking for. --kelapstick(bainuu) 02:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

ClueBot III

I want ClueBot to skip archiving the thread "People who edit my userspace" but archive everything else. How di I do that?

You can try Template:Do not archive until. --kelapstick(bainuu) 02:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

People who edit my userspace

Put your name here if you edit my userspace, not my user talk space.

ANI

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --allthefoxes (Talk) 03:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

  • The discussion is about WP:NOTHERE, specifically, if you're here to use Wikipedia as a social network or if you are actually improving our beautiful project. There are two ways to balance your contributions, which currently are almost all to your talk page: a. make fewer talk page edits. This is not Facebook. b. make more edits to article. This is an encyclopedia. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 03:57, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Nakon 04:00, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Unblock

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Okay, I will try and work on articles. I know a lot about games

Decline reason:

I think you should take a look at WP:STANDARDOFFER. That'll be the best way for you to go about regaining editing status. only (talk) 14:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Articles I will(hopefully) create

  1. vShare

Consider the Standard Offer

Hey Pokestar. You were blocked for being not here, mostly since all your edits were to your user talk page. Your ban is indefinite, and the only way to be unbanned at this point is to take WP:OFFER - Yet today I see you making even more edits to your talk page, which shows other editors you do not understand why you have been blocked. I think you should highly consider taking the standard offer if you wish to contribute again. --allthefoxes (Talk) 02:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Unbock with a good reason

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to make Wikipedia a better place. Next time I am blocked,I am okay by bring blocked indefinately. I promise to use my Talk Page for official reasons. I will archive me user page and include only the vital info. Also,I want to work on the articlevShare as a draft.

Decline reason:

I think you missed the "6 months" part of WP:STANDARDOFFER. Furthermore, I see no evidence whatsoever that you're here to build an encyclopedia. There are plenty of other sites for this sort of thing (Tumblr? Minecraft?) OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PokestarFan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am good on the Simple Wikipedia, I will do the same here. PokestarFan (talk) 22:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm inclined to agree with the sentiments expressed below. Also, what part of '6 months' is unclear? m.o.p 20:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Taking a quick look at your contributions there and some of the warnings and notes on your talk page, I would not agree with that assessment. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
As an admin at Simple and here, ditto. only (talk) 23:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
You have also received warnings at the commons. Mkdwtalk 19:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #194

Wikidata weekly summary #195

Wikidata weekly summary #196

Wikidata weekly summary #196

Wikidata weekly summary #197

Wikidata weekly summary #186

Wikidata weekly summary #198

20:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #199

18:37, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #200

Wikidata weekly summary #186

Wikidata weekly summary #201

16:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #202

19:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #203

20:45, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #204

Wikidata weekly summary #205

20:40, 18 April 2016 (UTC)