Welcome

edit

Hello, Pmg1000, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Pmg1000, you are invited to the Co-op!

edit
 
Hi there! Pmg1000, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

About original research and biographies of living persons

edit

Hi there. I see you recently added a bit of content to Gerald Posner. The problem is that Wikipedians are not allowed to publish their own research. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which means that depends on what secondary reliable sources say. The difference between primary and secondary sources, as defined on Wikipedia, can be confusing at first. Basically, a photograph is a primary source, and a newspaper article that analyzes and interprets the photograph is a secondary source. Government documents are generally primary sources, and although primary sources are not forbidden from use on Wikipedia, there are certain issues with using them. First, they can not be interpreted, analyzed, or used in a way to make them say anything that they do not already say. For example, unless a primary source explicitly says, "Gerald Posner misinterpreted a government document", you can not use it to back up such a claim. Interpreting primary sources is the job of secondary sources, not Wikipedia. Second, primary sources are heavily restricted in their use in biographical articles. This is prevent Wikipedians from interpreting primary sources to make harmful statements. Unless a newspaper, book, magazine, or other reliable secondary source has made a statement already, Wikipedia can not report it. If you have further questions, you can ask at the tea house (a forum for new users on Wikipedia) or the help desk (a forum for technical questions about editing Wikipedia). You might also want to browse through our core content policies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for you help

edit

Thank you, NinjaRobotPirate, for explaining why my edit was removed. I am new to this and usually publish in academic journals where primary sources are the gold standard. However, I take your point that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and thus only secondary sources are acceptable. As more reviews of God’s Bankers have now begun to be published which cite The National Archive document which I mentioned, I will attempt to rewrite by original edit using these secondary sources only. I also see the importance of using the Edit Summary to maintain a log of all changes and hope to use this and do so correctly. Pmg1000 (talk) 11:43, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Pmg1000! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:19, Monday, April 27, 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Pmg1000! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:12, Monday, April 27, 2015 (UTC)