Pithecanthropus4152

Welcome!

Hello, Pithecanthropus4152, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

References

Thank you for adding interesting tidbits to articles, such as Potrzebie and Duel. Unfortunately you did not supply your additions with references, so that they can be double-checked. Please see Wikipedia policies to this end, starting with WP:CITE. If you do not add references, your contributions may be reverted at any time. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

If I forget to sign a comment can I go back and do so later?Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Also, on a talk page, are we allowed to use personal experience or own research--for example, crunching the numbers from published government statistics--in order to make an argument? I got into a heated debate on the UCLA Talk page ([Section]) and was told original research isn't allowed. Well, I know it isn't allowed in the articles, but I thought it was OK to use it on a discussion point when criticizing the credibility of a source.Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isabelle Tyler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Tyler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Talk page guidelines

Greetings, Pithecanthropus4152. Thanks for your recent posts on Grateful Dead related articles. I would like to make two suggestions about posting on the talk pages of articles. (1) Sign your posts with four tildes, i.e. "~~~~" (without the quotes) -- see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Good practices for all talk pages used for collaboration (2) Add new topics to the bottom of the talk page, not the top -- see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Layout. Thanks! P.S. I see you've been editing Wikipedia for a few years, but check out Wikipedia:Tutorial if you haven't already, it's an excellent overview. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Palms, Los Angeles

Hi. I am just wondering about this change you made in the Palms, Los Angeles article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Palms,_Los_Angeles&diff=next&oldid=632392953. Did you check the source to see that it actually said that? I’m not sure where you got your information? Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 19:53, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

The link doesn't really indicate a particular passage, so could you please be more specific? But I'll go ahead and explain a couple of my sources that may be new to you. Sanborn maps are a nearly exhaustive set of maps covering hundreds if not thousands of towns large and small, from the late 19th Century to about the middle of the 20th. These maps were intended for use by fire underwriters in evaluating risks and would therefore note the location of potential hazards such as solvent factories, blacksmith shops (which in those days made extensive use of stationary gasoline engines), and lumber yards, and so on. On the other side of the coin they also recorded the locations firehouses, hydrants, and other facilities which served to reduce risk. The maps also showed the extent and details of residential and commercial development, right down to such details as the footprint of a house or building on the lot, number of stories, and building materials. The maps also make it possible to establish long-forgotten former streets, street names, and sometimes even address numbers. It's from these maps that we know present-day Tabor Street used to be Villa Avenue. Inevitably they have become a widely used reference for modern researchers both professional and amateur. Big-city public library systems often provide offsite access to the Sanborn database to their cardholders.

The 1904 guidebook passage has been fully cited. It's available online, at either Google Books or the Prelinger Archive--I forget which. However, it was in the form of a physical copy that I first read it. The guide tells us that the Palm Villa Hotel existed at least as late as its publication date, which is why I cite the guidebook when I say it existed "through 1904". I see now where this way of putting it suggests that the hotel definitely ceased to exist that year, which of course was probably untrue. I should probably change the wording there to acknowledge that fact.

ETA: Now I remember where I changed 1880 to 1890. The first number was a typo--the Times didn't even exist yet. Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 07:34, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:54, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Silver, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:20, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chinatown, Los Angeles may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• temple lined Ferguson Alley, a narrow one-block street running between the Plaza and Alameda. {{r|Estrada|page=244}) The most notable of the surviving buildings was the old Lugo house, having been built in 1838 by

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pithecanthropus4152. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Pithecanthropus4152. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

November 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hearts in Atlantis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Baba Rum Raisin (talk) 03:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Oh, come on now. If an author has their characters listening to "Sergeant Pepper" in 1965, do I really need to supply a cite?2601:1C0:CC01:384F:F8AF:EE48:67D9:CCD3 (talk) 06:31, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Per WP:FILMPLOT, plot summaries do not need a source. However, your addition included trivia which was not part of the plot and therefore it does indeed require a source. Also be aware that WP:FILMPLOT says "The plot summary is an overview of the film's main events, so avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes, and technical detail." Unless a song could be considered one of the "main events" of the novel, it's not really plot and does not belong in the plot section. Baba Rum Raisin (talk) 06:55, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pithecanthropus4152. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Citation needed tags

Please use {{citation needed}} instead of typing out "citation needed" in a ref tag. jp×g 11:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

July 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Toga, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. The linked site (blog? article?) shows what might be interpreted as togas, but doesn't name them as such. The way they're constructed and worn demonstrates little or no understanding of what distinguishes a toga from other drapery. The source doesn't support your more general conclusions or observations. Haploidavey (talk) 06:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Article (grammar). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Megaman en m (talk) 09:08, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

So then how can we describe a grammatical feature that every native speaker, and most 2L speakers understand, but probably doesn't have a citable online source? Moreover, while it's very easy to provide citations for "The Donald" and "The Gipper" from innumerable online news articles, they are frankly feeble examples that don't really get the point of articles used with personal names. The Donald and The Gipper refer to two specific individuals; nobody else can be The Donald or The Gipper. In German, by contrast, anyone named Donald can be der Donald, and it doesn't mean that the Donald in question is supposedly the most important Donald in the world, or even among all the Donalds known to the people in the conversation. If you meet a mutual friend coming down the street, you might ask them, Wie geht's dem Donald?, or literally "How's the Donald doing?", but more properly translated as "How's Donald doing?".Pithecanthropus4152 (talk) 08:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)