Pinkathon

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 27)

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pinkathon/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 15:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinkathon (May 4)

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

The topic is notable (0.9 probability), so we are simply discussing how to create an article that will survive a deletion process.

There is too much unreferenced verbiage. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. In an article of this length citations are essential, and for every fact that is likely to be susceptible to a potential challenge.

Much of the text is positioning and posturing. Lose all of that. Cut back to a draft that contains facts only, and that has full references for those facts. Lose anything that looks like advertorial

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinkathon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 08:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2015

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion, as you did at Draft:Pinkathon. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic