RE Finland-NATO edit

Hi - thank you for your recent edit to Finland-NATO relations. I'm not actually sure it's an improvement, because the same news is reported below in the 'Potential application' section, and the lead section, where you placed the new text, is meant to be a summary of the rest of the article, and the expectation of an application is already mentioned in the first paragraph. On those grounds I'm minded to revert it, but I'd like to hear what you think about whether the article's better or worse for the change (and, ideally, why; maybe we can figure out an even better way forwards). FrankSpheres (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey, thanks for the notice, I placed the update cuz Finland joining NATO is one of the most significant points of this article because it is one of the most significant moments in the history of Finland NATO relations which is why I believe it should be placed in the lead because of its overall importance to the article PilotSheng (talk) 15:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Makes sense. I agree it's a really significant and historically momentous moment, both for Finland and NATO and also for Europe-wide geopolitics. But, as I say, the expected application's already mentioned in the lead, which is meant to be an ultra-condensed version of the rest of the article. It's possible that today's news was previously not weighted enough in the lead, but I think that your version tips the other way and over-emphasises today's news over the 30-odd years of history and debate. I'll go ahead and try and redress the balance, and if you think it's still not right, go ahead and make some more changes yourself. FrankSpheres (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Sievierodonetsk edit

Compromise attempt [1]. EkoGraf (talk) 17:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

@EkoGraf excellent PilotSheng (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, PilotSheng

Thank you for creating 2022 Ukraine summer counteroffensive.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:10, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

List of Russian generals killed during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine edit

Greetings, I am contacting you regarding the article. I can't edit it. Please remove the information about Nasbulin. Ukrainian officials did not say anything about him, nor did the Russians confirm. This is only written by the yellow press, unreliable sources. In fact, such a person does not even exist. He was confused with Colonel Nasybulin, who is now wounded. You can read more here https://t.me/DeepStateUA/13387 Князь Полтавський (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Князь Полтавський, the Odessa Regional Military Administration claimed the death of Nasbulin on Telegram. This is an arm of the Ukrainian government. We generally don't cite Telegram unless it is supported by self-published media, which it has been here on Newsweek:[2]
It's not up to us to determine what or what not constitutes "yellow press". The only thing we can refer to is Wikipedia's list of deprecated sources, and try to avoid using those.
The "DeepStateUA" has not been cited by any reliable media, as far as I can find. Again, we try not to cite Telegram sources unless it is quoted in a reliable, self-published source not on Wikipedia's list of deprecated sources. Regardless of whether or not Major General Nasbulin was killed, and regardless of whether or not this person even exists, his death has been claimed by Ukraine, and thus deserves inclusion in the article as a "claimed" kill of a Russian general.
Thank you, PilotSheng (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@PilotSheng No no no. And how is the Odesa military administration connected with the events in the Kherson region? Official statements of Ukraine - General Staff, Ministry of Defense, Main Directorate of Intelligence, President of Ukraine, NSDC. Bratchuk himself does not run Telegram and it is ALWAYS just a repost of all the news that is somewhere on the Internet, it is not a primary source. His competence is only to comment on the Odesa region, not the events at the front. In the worst case, this is a statement by Bratchuk, and not officially by Ukraine.
Defense Express has cited DeepState several times. I gave you this link in the first place so that you could follow the history of this hoax for yourself, not for the Wikipedia article. The primary source is Roman Tsymbalyuk, who is a yellow press. Tsimbalyuk was simply repeated by Bratchuk, who repeats all the news that is available on the Internet.--Князь Полтавський (talk) 14:57, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Князь Полтавський If you feel strongly about this, go make the same point on the talk page of the list of Russian generals article here.
Talk:List of Russian generals killed during the 2022 invasion of Ukraine
If there's a consensus then we can remove the information. PilotSheng (talk) 15:22, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon edit

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon! edit

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Correction to previous election announcement edit

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon edit

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm WikiHannibal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 Ukrainian southern counteroffensive, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiHannibal (talk) 12:01, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Edey edit

Hi there. I reverted your change calling Zach Edey's mother a second-generation Canadian. The cited source says "first". My interpretation is that she and her parents immigrated to Canada. Are there sources that you can cite that say otherwise? Thanks in advance. —Bagumba (talk) 01:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Bagumba -- Julia Edey was born in Toronto. Here's a source: [3] with the following text:
"Long before Zach Edey was a rising college basketball star, Julia had her own basketball dream. Born in Toronto, Julia was one of five children in a self-described working-class household..."
I changed the article to reflect this. PilotSheng (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Or should we just explicitly say she was born in Toronto, and not mention generation, which would be implied? (Note that technically, the sources conflict, and it's possible she only grew up in Canada, and maybe we shouldn't mention any of it until it's clearer, but I'm not going to contest it.) Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 01:18, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
We could definitely just say she was born in Toronto. There's no need to specify the generation. PilotSheng (talk) 01:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open edit

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open! edit

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply