Welcome!

edit
 
Hello, PeaRidge62!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

 Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Valentina Gomez has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Valentina Gomez. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have read your comment. I am not creating a Wikipedia page for her simply because she's a candidate. I believe she should have a Wikipedia page because she is a significant public figure in the Missouri secretary of state race, with dozens of official mainstream news articles having been written about her. PeaRidge62 (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Valentina Gomez has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Valentina Gomez. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the comment. I am currently working to resolve the issue. PeaRidge62 (talk) 00:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valentina Gomez (May 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, PeaRidge62! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valentina Gomez (May 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 23:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Valentina Gomez (May 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CanonNi was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvement.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 00:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply