Pareshbanerjee
Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Pareshbanerjee/Opus Software Solutions (March 23)
edit
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pareshbanerjee/Opus Software Solutions.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/banking/finance/finance/mastercard-to-acquire-pune-based-electracard-for-an-undisclosed-sum/articleshow/35338037.cms http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303468704579571591600907418?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702303468704579571591600907418.html http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/MasterCard-acquires-Pune-based-processing-company/articleshow/35335427.cms Pareshbanerjee (talk) 13:44, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Pareshbanerjee/Opus Software Solutions (May 19)
edit Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pareshbanerjee/Opus Software Solutions.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- I have done a bit of general clean up on your article Draft:Opus Software Solutions. I have tried to align the citations as well. However, if the promotional pitch of the article is not toned down, acceptance is unlikely. Please also try to incorporate valid third party references on the company; most of the references relate to the subsidiary. You may visit my talk page to leave any messages. Cheers!! jojo@nthony (talk) 04:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Formatted your article Draft:Opus Software Solutions, added infobox and details, added and aligned the references. Trust the next reviewer will find it acceptable. Cheers!! jojo@nthony (talk) 06:14, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
|
Hello! Pareshbanerjee,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Opus Software Solutions has been accepted
edit
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
JustBerry (talk) 06:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Managing a conflict of interest
edit
Hello, Pareshbanerjee. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Opus Software Solutions, you may have a conflict of interest.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Widefox; talk 19:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
edit Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Widefox; talk 19:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Pareshbanerjee, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. from your edit history, your account and User:Opus mukund look like the same person. Your account name is that of a founder company of the article you created. Please read WP:COI and follow those guidelines including disclosing your COI. If both accounts are your's then you may want to close one, as editing with both is not allowed. Widefox; talk 19:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Opus Software Solutions for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opus Software Solutions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opus Software Solutions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox; talk 12:28, 12 December 2014 (UTC)