P4.UK

January 2010

Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. kiac. (talk-contrib) 01:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. kiac. (talk-contrib) 02:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Flyleaf. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 00:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Paramore discography, you will be blocked from editing. TorriTorri^{(Talk to me!)} 18:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:The Only Exception.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:The Only Exception.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 19:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Paramore MTV 2008.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Paramore MTV 2008.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 02:26, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:HangingOnByAThread.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:HangingOnByAThread.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  fetchcomms☛ 00:08, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:BreakingtheSilence.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BreakingtheSilence.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 01:50, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Candyo32 (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Flyleaf - Missing cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Flyleaf - Missing cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Hayley Williams

A tag has been placed on Template:Hayley Williams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. TorriTorri^{(Talk to me!)} 05:24, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Brand New Eyes

Hi there. You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Brand New Eyes#Disingenuous editing by User:P4.UK. --TorriTorri^{(Talk to me!)} 09:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

User:200.121.192.100

You very narrowly escaped a block here. Don't do it again. To ensure that you only edit while logged in, I have blocked the IP for two weeks. Tim Song (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Sock puppetry warning

Please do not abuse multiple accounts like you have with User:RioT0T, which I just blocked. Utilizing multiple accounts in a good hand, bad hand manner goes against our sockpuppetry policy and is grounds for blocking. Consider this your first and only warning on this. Regards, –MuZemike 00:02, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Hayley Dublin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hayley Dublin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 03:14, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

1. Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as List of awards, nominations received, and miscellaneous awards and honors by Paramore, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:52, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by Paramore, you may be blocked from editing. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 22:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Missing (Flyleaf song)

The article Missing (Flyleaf song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:57, 30 January 2014 (UTC)