User talk:OwenX/Archive 10

Sorry

hey dude sorry about that, i am new and i dont know what to do.. i am just trying to add the Safwa as a City in Saudi Arabia

Hadi800 12:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)hadi800

New Democratic Youth of Canada

I was trying to move the article "Young New Democrats" to "New Democratic Youth of Canada" in the proper manner, because I did a copy and paste, which supposedly is not the best why to do things.

-DCTasa

Possibly unfree Image:Id_of_israel_WIKI.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Id_of_israel_WIKI.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Award

		The Surreal Barnstar
		This Barnstar is for OwenX for reading my interesting facts and catching an error in one of my facts. This was really good to keep the reliability of all my facts high. Thanks again, OwenX, eventhough it probably took you a minute to do. BTW, I left you name on my page as another thanks! -- Penubag  05:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm really sorry this is so late. I know, you fixed it like 5 months ago. I just remembered now.-- Penubag  05:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Vandal fighting is thirsty work

Thanks for the tag-team effort on that IP. BrokenSphere^{Msg me} 21:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

(untitled 11 Aug 2007)

Hi!!! fsgasdfgadfg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikifunny778899 (talk • contribs)

Reverting userpage

Thanks for reverting my userpage :) — uniQue tree →talk← 00:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Thank you for reverting my user page as well. I was wondering when it would be vandalized, considering that most editors here at Wikipedia, who have been around Wikipedia for longer than four months and certainly editors who have been around longer than that, have had their user pages vandalized. Flyer22 04:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Miami

I received a message from you that told me not to delete a section on the Archdiocese of Miami page. The section I deleted is defamatory and incorrect. I have printed the page out and sent it to the Catholic League since it contains unverified accusations made against all 400 of the Catholic Bishops in addition to other errors. I have since added to the page to make it more complete, using information contained in articles that the site already references (Matt Abbott columns). I am the person who filed a grievance against the attorney who is trying to defame our Archdiocese. My name is Nancy Heise. Please email me at NancyHeise@aol.com if there is a problem you would like to discuss.

Dear Ms. Heise: Thank you for your cooperation. I am not familiar with the case, but unexplained removal of text from articles is generally seen as disruptive. I suggest you discuss the details on the article's Talk page with the other editors of that page. For now, I have left your updated version of the article as is, since it seems to capture both sides of this debate. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 00:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you OwenX. I am not a frequent editor of Wikipedia pages, I just happen to have intimate knowlede of the case cited in this article. My edits concerning my efforts can be verified by the Matt Abbott columns already referenced in the article. I think they are listed as reference item #3. I do not know how to add the little blue box with a 3 in it but that is what belongs after the paragraphs I added.

Hawaii Nation

saw your AfD for Hawaii Nation and I thought you might like to add Hawaii nation to it, as it's a duplicate page.— Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!)} 01:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Many thanks on the revert to my talk page. Not sure what it was about, but I had a good laugh out of it. Sometimes with some vandals all you can do is laugh. :) Take Care....NeutralHomer ^T:C 22:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Question..

Please don't block me. I didn't make a personal attack. I said that my post was not fake.. I can't believe what kinds of rules you have, I can't even post new posts anymore? :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehtabman (talk • contribs)

Don't play games with me, buddy. Telling someone he sucks or calling someone an idiot is not acceptable behaviour on Wikipedia. Watch it. Owen× ☎ 00:59, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Whoa. Sorry... I admit I did that stuff, but I thought you meant about my post. I agree that was rude, sorry about that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mehtabman (talk • contribs) 01:09:29, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Vandalism

Grr... You beat me to vandalism:( O well. Keep up the good work:)--†Sir James Paul† 23:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

†Sir James Paul† has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for the wrist slapping

Thanks for sorting out the young vandal who redesigned my user page. It's much appreciated :) WebHamster 00:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Grammar Is A Confusing Thing

And I have much to learn. :P And I see what you mean. At any rate, happy editing! :) -WarthogDemon 00:53, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The Radiator

Yes, she (it) needs a part in List of recurring robots from Futurama.

--User:Voltex115 (my talk)

Ceratitida

Yes, it will be an article eventually. Right now I'm using it to help me sort the Category:Ammonites into subcategories for each order of ammonite. Abyssal leviathin 02:13, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually, belive it or not I was just finishing up right when you messaged me. I'll turn Ceratitida into a real article the first chance I get. :) -Abyssal leviathin 02:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my pages. ... discospinster _talk 03:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Advice on Design Comics entry?

Hi Owen, I have tried to remove the "ad-ness" from the design comics entry; it's not intended as an advertisement and this is a recognized design descipline used by YAHOO, HP, Symantec, Sun, Cisco and other companies. Do you have advice on better ways to write it? (I have read the guidelines but maybe I am not getting something.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhardee (talk • contribs) 17:57, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

As it is right now, the Design comics article is more promotional than informational. I'm sure all the facts are true, but the tone isn't suitable for an encyclopedia. Please check other articles to get an idea of a proper tone and style for this article. Check Haptic or Office Assistant for some good examples. Owen× ☎ 18:09, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The End's Not Near, It's Here

Hey, just letting you know that the edits you reverted by 74.117.11.63 were clearly removal of vandalism; it even clearly states "removing vandalism" in the edit summaries. You even warned the person for fighting vandalism. Please take closer looks at the content that you're restoring from now on. Donkey Kong? Come on, man. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 04:27, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

My mistake. I apologized to the anon editor. Owen× ☎ 15:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

not advertising

This isn't my site. They're just good books that should be in Wikipedia. The instructions say that if a book shows up in LOC and Amazon then it can be in Wikipedia. And I wonder why your site has been vandalized over 160 times. Jeez... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Businessgirl (talk • contribs) 00:56, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

How dare you vandelize...

You dumb @%!@%!@. You deleted my articles. I don't know what your agenda is, but these are as news worthy as the stuff you're creating and fully legit under wikipedia rules. I'm reporting you as a vandal. Govern yourself accordingly... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Businessgirl (talk • contribs) 00:59, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Relevance

The vandalism of your page is relevant because it indicates that you have an agenda. I'm listing authors and book that are Christians and you obviously have some sort of agenda against Christians.

The guidelines say that: Books should have at a minimum an ISBN number (for books published after 1966), be available at a dozen or more libraries and be catalogued by its country of origin's official or de facto national library. For example, in the United States books are catalogued by the Library of Congress; United Kingdom at the British Library; Australia at the National Library of Australia; Canada at the Library and Archives Canada; France at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, China at the National Library Board; in Brazil by the Fundação Biblioteca Nacional; Argentina at Biblioteca Nacional de la República Argentina; and in India at the National Library of India. For a complete list, see List of national libraries. However, these are exclusionary criteria rather than inclusionary; meeting these threshold standards does not imply that a book is notable, whereas a book which does not meet them, most likely is not.

These books all meet the guidelines. You just don't like them becasue they're by Christians. They're notable because they've been ranked as one of the top 25 BAM books by the leading BAM blog. What are your qualifications for judging this? In looking at your posts I don't see any expertise in this area.

Again, you have an agenda and are vanadlizing my posts. I have reported you to the appropriate authorities. This will not be tolerated!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Businessgirl (talk • contribs) 01:13, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

Protect my userpage pls

I dunno where to post this - i saw you cleaned up two vandalisms on my userpage - i have good reason to believe that a coordinated vandalism campaign may soon be launched on my page from the users of a forum. Can you protect my page to prevent me from having to come back and check it daily. I'm inactive due to the way certain editors and administrators of this site treated me, but I don't want to have to worry about vandalism to my userpage either. Thanks in advance Lordkazan 17:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

thanks! 75.162.5.162 20:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Catalyst Manufacturing

Please advise how I can make the entry for Catalyst Manufacturing acceptable. I'm just trying to include it in the list of ERP software packages. Thanks, Greg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfgadv (talk • contribs) 01:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

First of all, the company or product has to be notable. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) to see if it qualifies; unless this product has been reviewed in major publications, chances are it isn't. Be sure to cite the relevant sources. Secondly, the article should be informative rather than promotional. Listing the features without mentioning a hint of criticism is a good indication of marketing material rather than encyclopedic information; articles must have a neutral point of view. Review the articles for other ERP packages to see what I mean. Owen× ☎ 01:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Made Up Words

I was just wondering what was so wrong about having this page up? I also would like to know where i could put the cite because i couldn't find it on the create a page area. Thanks for your time.

Bigbadwolfy 02:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for helping with that moronic vandal.--Mr Fink 19:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Yo man

I'm new at this. I don't understand why they keep deleting my article on Friends Stand United. I'm a chapter member here in Philly. I'm not making anything up, embellishing or taking a slanted view. Whats wrong with these wikifruits? Is wiki just another haven for power mad admins/mods that sit behind their screens dolling out "justice" as they see fit because they are safe at home? If so, to hell with this joint. I'll not subject myself to the whims of some interfreak on a ego-trip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Outpatienteight (talk • contribs) 12:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing that vandalism on my talk page. ♦^TH1RT3EN _{talk ♦ contribs} 17:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Synthetic aperture radar

Whoops! My bad, thanks for catching it. 70.100.251.10 14:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 22:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Futurama

Hello OwenX, I see you have been making some helpful edits to some Futurama episode articles. I don't know if you're a fan of the show or just a passer by but if you're interested please check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Futurama. In particular I am pushing for improvement of the episode articles and would appreciate any help. Either way, keep up the good work! Stardust8212 03:18, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bank of Israel logo.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bank of Israel logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bezeq logo.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bezeq logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:CAL Cargo Air Lines logo.png

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:CAL Cargo Air Lines logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sun D'Or logo.png)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Sun D'Or logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jusjih 00:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MAMRAM unit badge (en).png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MAMRAM unit badge (en).png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:31, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry

I was foolish enough to just use {{"db-userreq"}},instead of {{"db-userreq|rationale=rationale"}}. Ya see, I haven't been on Wikipedia for a while. And yet I have all these messages saying I was vandalizing pages, because my stupid brother was vandalizing pages purposely on my user name.Thinking nothing would come of it . Now I just want to delete everything to get rid of everything thanks for reminding me with your notice.TonyWWE 22:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC) TonyWWE

Forget it

I'm just abandoning the account.24.0.47.244 02:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC) TonyWWE