Onceuponatime123

Genesis flood narrative

"States" sounds fine to me, thanks.  Yintan  22:42, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Hello, I'm Raeky. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Young Earth creationism seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — raekyt 22:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Creation–evolution controversy, you may be blocked from editing. — raekyt 23:01, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Oppositional defiant disorder, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — raekyt 23:03, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Onceuponatime123. You have new messages at Raeky's talk page.
Message added 23:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— raekyt 23:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Young Earth creationism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — raekyt 23:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Onceuponatime123, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Onceuponatime123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

A recommendation

Here is an essay explaining the interaction between the Gospel and Wikipedia's NPOV policies. Given the nature of your edits so far, you could find the section of it on evolution and other science to be useful reading. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC)