Numismaticman

Banknotes of South West Africa

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Banknotes of South West Africa, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Banknotes_of_South_West_Africa. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 07:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Citizendium

Yes, Citizendium is very similar to Wikipedia. But until they clarify their license, we can't use the contents from there without risking running afoul of it. — Coren ^(talk) 23:59, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct that Citizendium uses the same software that Wikipedia does. But I'm affraid that, until and unless they decide to use the GFDL (or a GFDL-compatible free license) we cannot legaly reuse contents that comes from there. — Coren ^(talk) 14:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Numismatics style

Yes, I agree with you, an instance like this is where confusion arises because of the naming convention. It will be quite tricky to revamp the Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style without consensus, but if you want you can still propose a change on the discussion page. Since you have already left a note on the talk page of the WikiProject you should be getting some feedback from other contributors of numismatic-related articles.

Otherwise, you could propose merging the section on Coins of the South African Republic into Coins of the South African rand (or vice versa) - I don't see anything wrong with that, and I don't think that would be against the numismatics style, although I may be wrong.

Good work on starting Postal Orders of Gibraltar, I'll help out as much as possible. Cheers, Chris.B 12:10, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't have any postal orders with me at the moment but I'll try to get one, thanks for the suggestion.

Gibraltarian tokens are quite complex. Only a few have been catalogued by Krause-Mischler and the rest are very very scare. Have a look at this article where I have added all the "known" or officially catalogued tokens with images, plus a bit of the history of the Gibraltar's coinage too. Chris.B 12:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that's a good idea. I don't have the Krause catalogue myself so I will take it that you can fill in the catalogue numbers and any other details - that is assuming you own a copy of the catalogue. I can add the images and anything else. I'll also note the article Gibraltarian real at the top of the page. Thanks, Chris.B 13:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Traders' Currency Tokens of Gibraltar

Well I've added as much as I know with respect to category numbers. It's looks alright to me, what do you think? Chris.B 14:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem. The sentence was actually quite awkward, but I think I got the gist of it. Keep up the good work with numismatic articles bye the way, you are doing a great job. How come you haven't joined WikiProject Numismatics, I would have thought you were already a member. All you have to do is add your name to the list of participants. -- Chris.B 21:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Coincraft

A tag has been placed on Coincraft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 10:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Irish exile banknotes

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Irish exile banknotes, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://banknotewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Irish_exile_banknotes. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Please be careful. banknotewiki.com has no visible copyright/copyleft license, and so defaults to non-free all rights reserved. We cannot copy contents like this into Wikipedia without risking legal troubles for the foundation. Please read over WP:COPYRIGHT carefully, those rules are very important and must never be broken.

You've been warned to be more careful of copying before, and while you are obviously of good faith, you might end up being blocked if you keep copying non-free articles into the 'pedia. — Coren ^(talk) 02:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

The text you inserted into Irish exile banknotes is identical to that of http://banknotewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Irish_exile_banknotes. That is a copyright violation since the source site does not provide a copyright license allowing the copy. If you have gotten that same, identical text from another source that does allow copying, then you must cite that source with proper attribution. I'm sorry if you find this inconvenient, but that is absolutely required to avoid legal difficulties. — Coren ^(talk) 03:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Postal Orders of Fiji

Sorry, this is not a topic I know anything about --Xorkl000 23:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Yer what are they, I dont know these. Enlil Ninlil 09:06, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

I believe they are equivalent to checks for banks, in Australia there called Money orders and you can get them from any bank, they charge $3 for an amount under $1000. Enlil Ninlil 09:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Article naming style

Hi, I have some comments about the articles you created. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics#Recent addition of "banknotes of ..." and "postal orders of ..." articles. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 03:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Do not capitalize currency units

Please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics#Do not capitalize currency units. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 06:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

I am well aware of the standard catalog's style. I am also aware how you write articles on Wikipedia. But please discuss at the proper place, instead of my talk page. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 07:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

But why quote what other publications do, when Wikipedia has it's own style that has been in place long before you came along? Aidan, it appears that you just like to buck the system wherever you go. Bobby ^{I'm Here, Are You There?} 15:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Currency of the Solomon Islands

Prior to 1976, the Solomon Islands was a British protectorate under the name 'British Solomon Islands Protectorate'. There was no such currency as the Solomon Islands Pound, but there was a currency called the British Solomon Islands Protectorate pound, as the banknotes of the British Solomon Islands Protectorate are inscribed 'Government of the British Solomon Islands'. The nationality tag for currencies must be expressed correctly. The same thing goes for the Bruneian dollar and the Singaporean dollar. - (Numismaticman 06:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC))

I am not disputing the status of the Solomon Island before 1976. What I'm suggesting is that there is no need to encode the government form in the currency name. British Solomon Islands Protectorate it may have been, Russian Solomon Islands Commonwealth it could have hypothetically been. Doesn't matter, it's still Solomon Islands. I don't see French Fifth Republic franc or French Second French Empire franc. And since you like to write everything like the Standard Catalog of World Paper Money, I must point out that these banknotes are still listed under "Solomon Islands" in the Standard Catalog. It's on page 1008 of the 11th edition, 1368-1960. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 06:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

There is still a bit of incorrect labelling in the Pick catalogues. The British Solomon Islands banknotes is one such example. Another is the banknotes of New Guinea being incorrectly described as being from German New Guinea. Of course, the Swakopmund Bookshop's notes are wrongly listed under 'German South West Africa'.

The Krause catalogues are now putting the coins of Belize separate from the coins of British Honduras. I was using this logic as well. - (Numismaticman 07:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC))

You can't just pick and choose what style you want to copy from the Standard Catalog. By doing so, you're invalidating your own argument of capitalizing currency units. Why must we follow the Standard Catalog when it suits your style? I can also claim that the Standard Catalog is wrong about capitalizing because it's currency units are not proper nouns! This is what I've been saying all along, and you've been avoiding to respond. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 07:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Where's the evidence for this? What has writing an article of a country's numismatic article under the correct name of a country got to do with capitalising currency units? I don't see any connection at all, to be quite frank. - (Numismaticman 07:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC))

The connection is

• When you want to capitalize currency unit, you say it's because of the Standard Catalog
• When you want to name the Solomon Islands pound "British Solomon Islands Protectorate pound", you say the Standard Catalog is wrong

The Standard Catalog is in the middle that connects the two issues and exposes your contradiction. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 07:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Writing style

I have some concern over your writing style. Let me be brief.

• According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Sections and headings, section titles are sentence case (for example, “Rules and regulations”, not “Rules and Regulations”), and links are never used.
• According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Autoformatting and linking, full dates are to be wiki linked like [[15 January]] [[2007]]. I see you sometimes wiki link just day and month, sometimes, just month. Please be consistent.
• Please do not link to a generic currency unit article such as dollar. Instead, link to a specific dollar like the Solomon Islands dollar. Pound is worse, it's a disambiguate page. Links to disambiguate should be avoided even more.
• Please do not put everything under Category:Numismatics. That is category spam. While it is true that these articles may be of numismatics topics, they belong to the subcategory (e.g. Category:Banknotes. According to Wikipedia:Categorization, Golden Gate Bridge is in Category:Suspension bridges, so it should not also be in Category:Bridges.
• You might be interested to know that there is an easier way to cite references. See {{Numis cite SCWPM}}

--ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 07:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Commonwealth postal orders move

Hu requested that Commonwealth postal orders be moved back to Commonwealth of Nations postal orders. Since you moved the article to the current name, I'm leaving you a note about the proposal. The discussion area is here.--HarryHenryGebel 15:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Postal Orders of Alderney

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Postal Orders of Alderney, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Postal Orders of Alderney. Spinningspark (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Nigerian Security Printing and Minting Company Limited

A tag has been placed on Nigerian Security Printing and Minting Company Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Oddharmonic (talk) 20:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Numismaticman! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 905 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. William Gardner (English coin designer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of the Falkland Islands

The article Postal Orders of the Falkland Islands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Very little meaningful content. Not developed since creation and not likely to.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of The Gambia

The article Postal Orders of The Gambia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Very little meaningful content. Not developed since creation and not likely to.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 17:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of South West Africa

The article Postal Orders of South West Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Very little meaningful content. Not developed since creation and not likely to.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 17:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of the British Virgin Islands

The article Postal Orders of the British Virgin Islands has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Very little meaningful content. Not developed since creation and not likely to.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 17:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of the Dhekelia Sovereign Base Area

The article Postal Orders of the Dhekelia Sovereign Base Area has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Very little meaningful content. Not developed since creation and not likely to.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 17:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of the British Field Post Offices in Croatia

The article Postal Orders of the British Field Post Offices in Croatia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Little real content. Not developed since creation. Mostly a template.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Bungal

Bungal as in Bun Gallimhe (Galway), perchance? Fergananim (talk) 21:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of Ascension

The article Postal Orders of Ascension has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost no real content. Mostly a template. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of the British Field Post Offices in Afghanistan

The article Postal Orders of the British Field Post Offices in Afghanistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Little real content. Mostly a template. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of the British Army of the Rhine

The article Postal Orders of the British Army of the Rhine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost no real content. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of British North Borneo

The article Postal Orders of British North Borneo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Little real content. Not developed. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:18, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of Fiji

The article Postal Orders of Fiji has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Little content. Not developed since creation. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:20, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of Ghana

The article Postal Orders of Ghana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Little real content. Mostly a template. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of India

The article Postal Orders of India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost no real content. Mostly a template. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal Orders of the Orange River Colony

The article Postal Orders of the Orange River Colony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost no content. Mostly a template. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:27, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Old Age Pension Orders of the Isle of Man

The article Old Age Pension Orders of the Isle of Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very little content. Not notable. Has not developed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Volkskas Limited

The article Volkskas Limited has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very little content. Not notable. Has not developed since creation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swakopmund Bookshop

The article Swakopmund Bookshop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Well covered in: Banknotes of the Swakopmund Bookshop (South West Africa)

Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:37, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Governor of the Bank of Namibia

The article Governor of the Bank of Namibia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Covered in Bank of Namibia article. Separate article not necessary. Not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of William Gardner (English coin designer)

The article William Gardner (English coin designer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject is a minor figure. Not notable. Very sketchy content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maidonian (talk) 00:45, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of South African Republic pond

I have nominated South African Republic pond, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South African Republic pond. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 05:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Postal orders of Nigeria

The article Postal orders of Nigeria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article created by blocked sockpuppet

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ireland 1996 25 euro coin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ireland 1996 25 euro coin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ireland 1996 25 euro coin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 12:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Postal orders of Bangladesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Postal orders of Bangladesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postal orders of Bangladesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Worldbruce (talk) 00:28, 26 March 2021 (UTC)