Welcome edit

 
Here are some lamingtons to welcome you to WikiProject Australia!

G'day Notamitchell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Article titles
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 01:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, great to be here. This seems like an automated message? Are things currently very active? Notamitchell (talk) 02:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
The message is part of preferences - once you get past edit number/time - you are able to be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_access_levels#Autoconfirmed_users - and then in preferences - you are able to gain access to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Twinkle - which in turn can allow you to welcome new users - it requires another editor to send the message, some do, some dont... as to activity - depends where and which way you look at it - you can, if you are keen - look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges - which can overwhelm or otherwise... as to the oz project - what aspect ? JarrahTree 04:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, I think I'll just stick to small edits/references and biographies for now Notamitchell (talk) 00:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew May (historian) has been accepted edit

 
Andrew May (historian), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 15:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Notamitchell (talk) 00:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Andrew May (historian) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew May (historian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew May (historian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply