Not so much lovers as friends

m:CheckUser_policy:The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to check a user. Note that alternative accounts are not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of the policies (for example, to double-vote or to increase the apparent support for any given position).

So User:ST47 has demonstrated how rule of law works. This kind of self-report and then self-check and immediately silence victims have never seen before even in Chinese Wikipedia. @Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, GorillaWarfare, Joe Roe, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Mkdw, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, and Xeno: I am so sorry for disturbing you all but since ST47 just exercised the broadest discretion I have ever seen on multiple Wikipedia platforms, and because check user permission is granted by you all, I feel an urge to notify you. Thank you for listening. I just hope English Wikipedia could set an example for other Wikipedia around the world. Best regards. Not so much lovers as friends (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

I've revoked your talk page access. You can email the Arbitration Committee if you would like us to hear your appeal. Please read the guide to appealing blocks first. – bradv🍁 14:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)