Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Nostalgiacritic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 02:59, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Daniel Sullivan (Oklahoma politician) edit

 

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Daniel Sullivan (Oklahoma politician), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Daniel_Sullivan,_Oklahoma_Representative.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Sullivan (Oklahoma politician) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Daniel Sullivan (Oklahoma politician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this:   which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pointillist (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

June 2011 edit

  Your addition to Dale DeWitt has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. causa sui (talk) 21:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dale DeWitt edit

 

The article Dale DeWitt has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Missouri House of Representatives edit

Greetings -- I'm curious as to why you removed Shane Schoeller as Speaker Pro Tem from the Missouri House of Representatives Wiki. Especially since it was done with no summary or reason stated. For now I'll treat this as a good faith error and not deliberate vandalism. If you have a valid reason, please message me back and explain. Thanks. Sector001 (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

July 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Republican Party of Minnesota, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SWMNPoliSciProject (talk) 21:00, 01 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Capitalization of headings edit

Hey Nostalgiacritic,

The Wikipedia style for capitalizing headings is to use "sentence case" instead of "title case", e.g.,

Important things to know about this subject

not:

Important Things to Know About This Subject

This may be unfamiliar to many editors who believe that or have been taught that "title case is the right way to capitalize headings". It isn't the "right way", it is one style. Wikipedia has, for better or worse, chosen to follow a different style, i.e., capitalize the heading the same way you would capitalize any sentence:

  • capitalize the first word,
  • capitalize any proper nouns (people, places, organizations), and
  • begin all other words with lower case letters.

See WP:MSH for more information. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 02:34, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Also, please note that WP:MSH says:

"Headings should not explicitly refer to the subject of the article, or to higher-level headings, unless doing so is shorter or clearer (Early life is preferable to His early life when his refers to the subject of the article; headings can be assumed to be about the subject unless otherwise indicated)."

So in an article about, for example, the Montana Democratic Party, a section about chairmen of the party should be headed "Chairmen", not "Chairmen of the Montana Democratic Party". The latter form is longer than it needs to be, because we can assume that a list of chairmen in an article about the MDP is not referring to chairmen of the Communist Party of China, or another organization. Regards, Ground Zero | t 13:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Please stop using the incorrect capitalization of headings. I've tried to explain the Wikipedia style to you above. If there is anything that you don't understand about WP:MSH, please feel free to ask instead of continuing to make these unnecessary errors. Also, when making the plural form of a noun , e.g., "officials", it is incorrect to put the "s" in parentheses. If there is more than one of a thing, then you just add the "s" to the end of the noun without parentheses. If there is only one, then you leave the "s" off. Putting the "s" in parentheses is something that it only appropriate for legal documents. It is inappropriate for Wikipedia, which is written in plain English to be read by average readers, as opposed to lawyers. Thank you for your cooperation on both of these matters, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regards, Ground Zero | t 01:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • With your edits to Wyoming Democratic Party and Wyoming Republican Party, it appears that you are determined to edit "your way" instead in the Wikipedia style. Please accept that the Wikipedia community has adopted a certain style to apply to Wikipedia articles. Ignoring Wikipedia style and using your own style instead is disruptive. Ground Zero | t 10:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Anthony Kennedy edit

Please stop adding unsourced information to the Anthony Kennedy article. To say he is a Republican in the infobox, you have to find a reliable source that states that is his political affiliation.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

State legislators' Infoboxes edit

Hi. Thanks for your edit to Al McAffrey, including adding his senate service to the infobox. In case you're not aware, the infobox has specific parameters for state legislators, which ensure a consistent format across all articles in keeping with our Manual of Style. For state reps, you can use state_house=Oklahoma and district=88th to automatically display "Member of the Oklahoma House of Representatives from the 88th district", for example. For state senators, it's state_senate=California. Where lower houses are called assemblies or houses of delegates, use state_assembly=Wisconsin or state_delegate=Virginia, for example. Hope this helps! --Lincolnite (talk) 00:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Editor's Barnstar
Congratulations, Nostalgiacritic, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia!

Thank you for improving and expanding articles on U.S. politics, and for all your contributions to the encyclopedia. Keep up the great work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 21 edit

Hi. When you recently edited Solid South, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles E. Hughes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Legislature caucus shading edit

The shading is used to indicate the majority caucus in the legislature. Shading every single cell in the table defeats this purpose. --Kurykh (talk) 07:24, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Edit Summaries edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! —Mr. Matté (Talk/Contrib) 04:15, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nebraska Legislature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Jim Smith, John Nelson, Greg Adams and Thomas Hansen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Montana House of Representatives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Nancy Wilson, Steve Gibson, Mike Miller, David Moore, David Howard, Tom Woods, Ray Shaw, Bill McChesney and Daniel Salomon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:46, 5 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to United States Congress may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeff Kessler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Hall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nevada Assembly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Nostalgiacritic. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oklahoma Legislature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Schultz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Nostalgiacritic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Nostalgiacritic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 5 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louisiana House of Representatives, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Nelson and Charles Henry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply