Your submission at Articles for creation: Quinnox Inc. (February 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samuell1616 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. One life to live (talk) 16:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Nitesh Gosalia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! One life to live (talk) 16:09, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Quinnox Inc. concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Quinnox Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I noticed that in this edit to Backlash (engineering), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheImaCow (talk) 12:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bandhani Lehenga by Roopkala Sarees.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Bandhani Lehenga by Roopkala Sarees.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://roopkalasarees.com/product/pink-bandhani-lehenga-red-banarasi-dupatta/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit

  This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Phosphatidylserine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. The fitmom site is spam - do not use nonsense blogs on Wikipedia. Zefr (talk) 13:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Zefr,

Apologies if this came across as spam. All I was doing is updating a broken link that I had happened to add earlier. Rest assured there was no intention for any sorts of spam link. I'm just trying while learning to build a site that is going to help a lot of people learn about their health and food.

Sign and timestamp your talk page comments by using the signature icon or four tildes. If you're not trained in medical science, you should not edit medical or human health content. Read WP:MEDRS for the guide to source quality. Zefr (talk) 14:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Person who curates and owns the content on the site Fit.Mom is an certified K11 (https://www.keleven.com/) diploma/degree holder as well as an NASM Certified Trainer. The National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM) Certified Personal Trainer (CPT) program is the most widely recognized and accepted CPT certification in the fitness industry of the United States of America. With their partners in 45 countries and certified fitness professionals in over 90 countries across the world, NASM also commands a strong global identity. I'm just helping him get the correct content and message to help whomever possible through the website.