NinjaBro

MLKKK, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MLKKK! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Nostalgia Critic episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Nostalgia Critic episodes was changed by MLKKK (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9566 on 2016-12-31T00:43:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:43, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Bojo1498. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Christina Grimmie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hwalk | talk | contribs 19:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Interpetive *-gonist labels

Hi there, re: this, though you obviously meant well, WikiProject Television prefers that we not add interpretive labels (antagonist/protagonist/hero/villain) in articles. Please see WP:PROTAGONIST. Though that guideline is specifically for film articles, it is still widely embraced by WikiProject Television. The feeling is that it should be clear from character descriptions who the important characters are and what roles they have in the storytelling. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:57, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Polyester Enterprises

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Polyester Enterprises requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:45, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Illumination Entertainment, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 17:55, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Neighbours from Hell. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carniolus (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Spotify. Jim1138 (talk) 04:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "MLKKK", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is based off a fictional troll's user name from the cartoon South Park and is meant to be offensive as a portmanteau of MLK and KKK.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 08:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bee Gees, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ThatGirlTayler (talk) 23:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Hybrid video game console.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Consider this edit to also cover your edits to video game templates and adding unsourced ninth generation. -- ferret (talk) 17:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of mascots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Toxic Avenger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hotel Transylvania 3. Carniolus (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NinjaBro. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)