AfC notification: Draft:Deborah Mannas has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deborah Mannas. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deborah Mannas moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Deborah Mannas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 09:12, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Deborah Mannas has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deborah Mannas. Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 12:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Deborah Mannas has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deborah Mannas. Thanks! Fade258 (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deborah Mannas (August 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nihara.widefy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Treymond Smith (August 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021 edit

 

Hello Nihara.widefy. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Treymond Smith, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nihara.widefy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nihara.widefy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. You name suggests you work for https://widefy.in - Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion KylieTastic (talk) 11:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Will Roberts (actor) has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Will Roberts (actor). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Roberts (actor) (August 31) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:36, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deborah Mannas (August 31) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Neutral point of view edit

Please read the Wikipedia policy on Neutral Point of View again. You have written at least three drafts that all appear to be written to praise their subject rather than to describe them neutrally. Neutral Point of View is the second pillar of Wikipedia. If you have questions about neutral point of view, please ask to the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Treymond Smith (September 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Roberts ( Hollywood actor) (September 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:46, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deborah Mannas (September 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Roberts (actor) (September 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:08, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Creation edit

Hi Nihara,

I'm just following up on the COIN (Conflicts of Interest Noticeboard) discussion, as I understand that you are a newer user, and wanted to point you in the direction of the notability guidelines on Wikipedia such that you don't face the frustration in the future of creating an article only to see it rejected or deleted.

These guidelines are quite broad, but if you understand one subsection of them, the general notability guidelines, you will be in a much better place to create articles on suitable topics that will remain in the encyclopaedia. If you intend to continue writing articles about people, I would also suggest reading WP:Notability (People). I won't go into details here, as the content there is much clearer than I can provide, but if you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask.

In terms of finding suitable topics, I notice you are interested in biographies, specifically of entertainers. Could I point you towards Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/DoWW/Film+Stage? The Women in Red project is an important effort to boost the gender disparity in Wikipedia articles, and to that end they have created extensive lists of articles that need to be created; the one I linked is for entertainers, both historical and modern - any efforts you can make towards creating one or more of those articles are almost certain to be well received.

For a more general project dedicated to creating biographies of entertainers, I would also point you towards Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers; they don't have the same specificity of articles needed, but there are some excellent resources there.

In any case, best of luck with your future editing, and if have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me, either in a reply to this, or on my talk page. Alternatively, you can go to the WP:Teahouse, but I believe you have discovered that one on your own.

Best regards, BilledMammal (talk) 12:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hello, Thank you so much for your advice. Sugesstions you gave to me I'll keep that in mind thank you.

Copyright problem: Draft:Deborah Mannas edit

  Hello Nihara.widefy, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Deborah Mannas, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.prlog.org/12882077-deborah-debbie-is-singersongwriter-and-published-poet.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Deborah Mannas saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:52, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've blanked and listed Draft:Will Roberts (actor) and Draft:Treymond Smith for the same reasons. You may not copy material from non-free external sources. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:09, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021 edit

 

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, as you did at Draft:Deborah Mannas. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Treymond Smith edit

  Draft:Treymond Smith, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Treymond Smith and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Treymond Smith during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)Reply