April 2016

edit

  Hello. An edit that you recently made to FC Bayern Munich seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Albanians, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 13:48, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Serbs. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced seemingly POV edits (increasing population figures for Albanians and lowering population numbers for Serbs, in both cases with no sources of any kind...). Thomas.W talk 13:51, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Argjend Malaj. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Qed237 (talk) 16:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2017

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Albanians. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hammersoft (talk) 02:18, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Albanians. Dr. K. 00:51, 3 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Albanians— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply


  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arvanites, you may be blocked from editing. Catlemur (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Arvanites. Nanophosis (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:45, 15 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Albanian Migration to France

edit

Hello. Thank you for creating articles for Wikipedia.

An article you recently created, Albanian Migration to France, does not have a single source. Verifiability is one of the most important policies, which means all content in Wikipedia must be verifiable. Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and will not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. If you do not want your article to be deleted, please add at least one reliable source.

I've tagged the article in question with {{unreferenced}}. If you have added a source to it, you may remove the tag. If you have any questions, you may ask on my talk page, at the Teahouse or help desk. Happy editing! —AE (talkcontributions) 08:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Regarding the Tirana article

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Vargmali (talk) 08:22, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Se pari ishte ne Faqjen Zyrtare te Tiranes numri i 800.000 Banoreve. Kshtu qe esht skandal se ju nuk e akzepotini raportimet e Faqes Zyrtare te Tiranes. Turp

Në rradhë të parë mësoni të përdorni wikipedian para se të editoni. Në rradhë të dytë kuptoni dallimin midis të dhënave të qarkut dhe të dhënave në nivel bashkie. Ato të dhëna që po citoni ju janë të qarkut (ndarje më e gjerë se bashkia e Tiranës), që i përdor vetë bashkia për interesat/injorancën e saj nuk i bën të sakta. Deri tani të dhënat më të reja në nivel bashkie janë të 2011, po deshët pyesni vetë te INSTAT, institucioni që mbledh të dhënat (këtë nuk e bën bashkia). Të dhënat të reja për popullsinë e Tiranës në nivel bashkie priten pas censusit të 2020. Instat rifreskon shpesh vetëm të dhënat në nivel qarku.
Konkretisht qarqet:
https://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qarqet_e_Shqip%C3%ABris%C3%AB
Konkretisht bashkitë:
https://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bashkit%C3%AB_e_Shqip%C3%ABris%C3%AB
Siç dhe duket, qarku i Tiranës përveç se bashkinë e Tiranës përfshinë dhe bashkinë e Kamzës, të Vorës, të Kavajës dhe të Rrogozhinës. Pra nuk përkojnë me njera tjetrën.
Para se të bëni edite shiko talk-page dhe komento aty pasi të fshish editet pa shpjegim është kundra rregullave të wikipedias. Vargmali (talk) 07:39, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Me vjen keq shoku Vargmali por jeni komplet gabim. 883.996 Banore i ka Qarku i Tiranes, ktu pajtohemi ti dhe une. Tani shkruje ne Faqe te Wikipedies qe te dyjat. 500.000 Banore Qyteti dhe 883.996 Banore Qarku. Jo vetem 500.000 Banore. Kjo asht gabim.

Proposed deletion of Blerim Bunjaku

edit
 

The article Blerim Bunjaku has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 09:58, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ylfete Fanaj

edit
 

The article Ylfete Fanaj has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 09:58, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Zari Xhaferi

edit
 

The article Zari Xhaferi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 09:58, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Saruhan Hünel

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saruhan Hünel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Melcous (talk) 07:34, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply