NeroAxis
|
- You have deleted a significant amount of information from the Brighton article. Please remember to include an edit summary when making such actions otherwise other editors do not know the reason why you have done this. I have reinserted the information for now. Thanks. Paste Let’s have a chat. 15:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
editPlease do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Andy Murray. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- It is not personal commentary, it is an objective analysis of the facts and a consequent adaptation of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeroAxis (talk • contribs) 13:34, 26 June 2009
- This issue has been discussed to death on the talk page, and consensus reached as to how to proceed. If you disagree then the onus is on you to attempt to change people's minds on the talk page, not to repeatedly re-edit the article (especially not while changing the admonishment in the accompanying comment to say exactly the opposite of what it previously did). Doing so will likely lead to your being blocked from editing entirely. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I will continue to state the truth on that page, as all Wikipedians, without regard for circumstance or consensus, should always do. The facts are on my side, any attempt to block me from editing, and the subsequent legal process which will follow, will reflect that.
- Stop the edit warring immediately. You are close to violating the three revert rule, in which case you will be blocked for disruptive behaviour. If you have issues with the content of the article, discuss it on the article's talk page. LeaveSleaves 14:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
As I have stated before, I am doing nothing wrong in a legalistic sense, and therefore should not be subjected to a ban on the basis of my actions. You are welcome to ban me, but please be aware of the legal consequences that the individual who commits the action will face.
- You have been reported at edit warring noticeboard. Also please read Wikipedia policy on making legal threats. LeaveSleaves 15:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your edits to the Andy Murray article without discussion on the talk page or referring the consensus reached there. This matter has been debated at great length on this article before and the status quo reached. Changing things with no regard to consensus will simply be reverted and be a waste of your and others' time. It is also liable to end up on you being blocked from editing if you continue to edit war.
There is a reason for every part of the article that touches on Murray's nationality. These reasons derive from Wikipedia policy about nationality, Murray's own statements, and the general style guide for Tennis related articles. If you believe you have sound arguments that counter all these then please bring them to the talk page. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
editYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
User notice: temporary 3RR block
editRegarding reversions[1] made on June 26 2009 to Andy Murray
edit{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Also, please use the "edit summary" to mark your edits as reverts, when they are. "rv" is conventional.
William M. Connolley (talk) 15:58, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Anglo-Saxon colonization of Britain
editI saw your comment on a discussion board on the British Germans article saying you was suggesting making an article about the Anglo-Saxon colonization of Britain, if you do consider starting up an article I would gladly help and contribute to it, my official account is davido488 if you want to contact me about your decision cheers.86.135.58.219 (talk) 02:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)