Neeru0687
Welcome!
edit
Hello, Neeru0687, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
- Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- How to add those all-important references
- Simplified style guide
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Nick Moyes (talk) 14:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Maurizio Andolfi
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Maurizio Andolfi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 17:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
February 2022
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Neeru0687 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry if I caused problems with my article, I was trying to modify it in order to make it less a promotion article and more an encyclopedia article. From what I believe the article didn't sound like a promotion, that's why I am going to study better Wikipedia rules for new articles. I am eager to become a good reviewer! Neeru0687 (talk) 18:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Once you have studied Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, but not before, feel free to make an unblock request. You'll want to specifically address WP:COI and WP:PROMO and tell us what you plan to write about instead, and how your future edits would be different. Yamla (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Neeru0687 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I learned a lot from the links provided, first of all by realizing that there is no conflict of interest in the article I created. This is because I simply wanted to create an article about a pioneer of family therapy, a subject I am interested in and studying, which does not currently exist on the wiki. I realize I went too heavy on external links, I probably should have studied the guidelines better before publishing the page. What I can say is that my future articles will be much more objective and thought out, I will certainly need more time to research and also include references that can confirm what I write. I will also have to change my writing method, making it more "encyclopedic". What I would like to write in the future are articles that allow users to better understand a particular topic, perhaps by stimulating their curiosity. Neeru0687 (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.