NativeEarthC1tizen

NativeEarthC1tizen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi NativeEarthC1tizen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Gateway Pundit) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Gateway Pundit, NativeEarthC1tizen!

Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Consider adding reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Meatsgains (talk) 15:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Meatsgains Thanks for the advice. — NativeEarthC1tizen (talk) 15:43, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at University of California, Berkeley. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SkyWarrior 19:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi SkyWarrior I added content (a new subheading called 'Media Attention') to this page and someone keeps deleting my contribution. My content has been deleted several times with no justification given. I have not touched anyone elses contribution to the article. I will also post on the articles talk page about this. — NativeEarthC1tizen (talk) 20:48, 8th February 2017 (UTC)

Your addition has been reverted four times; that is edit warring and can be seen by some as a violation of WP:3RR. If you wish to add the content to the page, please get consensus to do so on the talk page. In the meantime, see WP:NOTNEWS, the main reason for the removal of your addition. SkyWarrior 20:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello again SkyWarrior someone deleted my contribution without giving a valid reason why, so I copied and pasted my content back into the article. It took time for me to do the research and reference the material. So to see my work deleted for no reason was very frustrating. However, I read WP:NOTNEWS and recognize how my contribution could have contravened these guidelines. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction in regards to adding content. — NativeEarthC1tizen (talk) 22:17, 8th February 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome. To be honest, I personally believe that it should be at least mentioned, but in a condensed form as a part of the history section, no more than one, two, maybe three sentences. I would wait until more comments roll in before implementing the changes, though, if consensus allows their addition in the first place. SkyWarrior 21:21, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 19:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Doug Weller thanks for the heads up. I did not realize. Can you let me know how to unmark my contribution as minor? Is it possible to undo? — NativeEarthC1tizen talk 21:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Neutrality^talk 20:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

This is a standard alert given to all those who edit in the topic area and does not imply anything about any user's conduct. Neutrality^talk 20:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)