Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Coleman (June 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
Chris Troutman (talk) 00:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Natalia.chase, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 00:39, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia!!! edit

Hello Natalia.chase! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am happy to be the first person to welcome you to English Wikipedia! I have prepared this welcome message to help you with your continued adventure here, check out the links below or just visit the new contributors' help page! Happy Editing! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started: Tutorials and Training
Click on "show" to the right to expand

We have some interactive tutorials and trainings you may want to try:

And some regular articles you can just read:

Getting Help: How and Where to Ask a Question?
Click on "show" to the right to expand

There are numerous ways you can ask for help.

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date

On a final note, you may want to try the new (beta) VisualEditor, check out our weekly newspaper, the Wikipedia Signpost, and join a WikiProject of interest to you. WikiProjects gather editors interested in certain topic areas, providing them with information, tools and a place to discuss the topic in question. . For a list of all WikiProjects, see here. Joining a WikiProject makes the Wikipedia experience much richer! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Chris Troutman (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome. Nice to hear that you're not here to promote anything. What are the constructive contributions you've made so far? Deb (talk) 19:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Coleman (December 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hell in a Bucket was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 23:48, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Tom Coleman concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tom Coleman, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Tom Coleman edit

 

Hello, Natalia.chase. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Tom Coleman".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Tom Coleman}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:43, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia policies on paid editing edit

 

Hello Natalia.chase. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to SNAP Interactive. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Natalia.chase. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Natalia.chase|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. - Brianhe (talk) 19:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

yes you are mistaken i m not being compensated for my edits. 22:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Natalia.chase (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Hollenderek". The reason given for Hollenderek's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hol


Decline reason: Now blocked directly. Yamla (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply